Close Menu
Web StatWeb Stat
  • Home
  • News
  • United Kingdom
  • Misinformation
  • Disinformation
  • AI Fake News
  • False News
  • Guides
Trending

The disastrous consequences of an epidemic of misinformation about the safety of vaccines

July 8, 2025

Azerbaijan pushes back against wartime disinformation

July 8, 2025

National Misinformation and Disinformation Bill to be laid in Parliament – Sam George 

July 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web StatWeb Stat
  • Home
  • News
  • United Kingdom
  • Misinformation
  • Disinformation
  • AI Fake News
  • False News
  • Guides
Subscribe
Web StatWeb Stat
Home»United Kingdom
United Kingdom

NHS Trust Reverses Controversial Claim That Trans Women Can Breastfeed Like New Mothers Amid Backlash

News RoomBy News RoomDecember 3, 20243 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Telegram Email LinkedIn Tumblr

In a significant turn of events, the University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust has retracted its previous claims regarding transgender women’s ability to breastfeed, following escalating outrage from various campaigners and advocacy groups. Earlier this year, a leaked letter from the Trust’s medical director indicated that breast milk produced by transgender women—who are biologically male—through the administration of powerful drugs was allegedly comparable to milk produced by cisgender women post childbirth. This statement arose in response to complaints about the Trust’s guidelines suggesting that transgender women ‘may be able to induce lactation.’ The revelation sparked intense criticism and concern, prompting the Trust to reassess its approach.

The Trust’s guidelines, which have since been deleted, initially stated that some parents, irrespective of their biological status, might wish to partake in infant feeding using their bodies, even if they hadn’t given birth. This included the assertion that transgender women could potentially induce lactation. Critics, however, have pointed out that there exists a significant lack of robust evidence to support the safety and nutritional quality of milk produced in this manner. The Trust had previously cited a study claiming that milk from induced lactation showed ‘no observable side effects’ in infants, a claim that now appears to have been abandoned following public backlash.

In light of the mounting pressure from various groups, including campaigners focused on women’s rights and child welfare, the Trust clarified that its initial guidance was not intended to promote breastfeeding among transgender women but rather aimed to assist a small number of lesbian couples wishing to facilitate breastfeeding. They acknowledged that there had been no documented instances where transgender individuals sought support for breastfeeding in relation to their partner’s child.

The reaction from advocacy groups has been swift and severe. Helen Joyce from the campaign group Sex Matters expressed her concern over the delayed acknowledgment from the Trust that biological men cannot breastfeed. This revelation has reignited discussions surrounding the dissemination of accurate information concerning transgender health and parental rights. Milli Hill, a prominent advocate for women’s rights, emphasized the potential risks posed to infants due to misinformation, asserting that the integrity of the health guidelines is crucial for the safety of vulnerable populations.

Emma Thomas, founder of Children of Transitioners—a group supporting children with parents who transition—also voiced her frustration regarding the initial guidance. She raised the alarm about the possible negative implications this misinformation may have had on countless children globally. Thomas expressed her disappointment in not knowing how many children could have suffered adverse effects as a consequence of the Trust’s misguided policies.

In conclusion, this controversy underscores the broader societal challenges surrounding transgender issues, particularly regarding parental roles and the medical establishment’s responsibilities. The Trust’s retraction serves as a critical reminder of the necessity for evidence-based health policies that prioritize the well-being of both parents and their children. As the dialogue continues, the implications of this incident may have lasting effects on the way healthcare providers address complex issues relating to gender identity and parenting in the future.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
News Room
  • Website

Keep Reading

Misinformation Allegations in £156m Plymouth Scheme – ivybridge-today.co.uk

Police warn against sharing ‘misinformation’ over death of Dundee scientist

Social media algorithms need overhaul in wake of Southport riots, Ofcom says | Social media

What impact do climate change misinformation and disinformation have? HTML

RFK Jr: Fact-checking his views on health policy

Council chiefs warn of ‘corrosive impact’ of fake news

Editors Picks

Azerbaijan pushes back against wartime disinformation

July 8, 2025

National Misinformation and Disinformation Bill to be laid in Parliament – Sam George 

July 8, 2025

Fighting distractions and disinformation in the age of AI

July 8, 2025

Experts seek sanctions against promoters of public health misinformation

July 8, 2025

7 action items to combat disinformation campaigns

July 8, 2025

Latest Articles

Court Blocks 27 Channels for ‘False, Anti-State’ Content

July 8, 2025

Misinformation, AI, Armed Conflict: What The Wealthiest Countries Worry About The Most

July 8, 2025

Kremlin Propaganda Targets Baltic States via Social Media, Warns Counter-Disinformation Center

July 8, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
Copyright © 2025 Web Stat. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.