Is it ethical to use idyllic images of animals roaming outdoors, in advertising and on packs, when most are intensively farmed? Some argue it’s deliberately misleading, while others regard it acceptable if it represents some animals in their supply chain. However, putting a positive spin on something turns into disinformation. When images lack factual accuracy, they spread false information, serving political ends rather than factual truth.
The Image represents reality, True-washing doesn’t. While greenwashing and nutrition-washing stand Grammy scrutiny, there’s less focus on animal welfare. Humane-washing, which uses misleading labels and imagery, sells product claims without addressing the actual conditions of farmed animals. By portraying happy cows and happy chickens on packs, brands facilitate consumer trust, but this depictions do not accurately reflect the often-negative features of farmed animals. The industry’s))/