Misinformation campaigns using manipulated images can deepen divisions, even incite violence, and often persist long after the initial information is disseminated.
The use of manipulated images in propaganda often goes beyond spreading misinformation; it can create divisions between people, even those who may not otherwise feel strongly about the topic. These manipulations can originate from having not merely verifiably authentic sources, but also from acts of self-enhancement and alteration of personal or public identities.
Ethical inquiry into the production and dissemination of manipulated images raises complex questions about the boundaries of photographistry. For instance, it explores whether it is permissible for a knowledgeable individual, either personal or professional, to edit out their own photos to promote a different perspective or campaign. Similarly, altering images in sensitive contexts, such as those involving sensitive personal information or the purchasing of controversial products, raises ethical concerns.
The legal and ethical implications of using image manipulation are particularly significant, especially in contexts where public trust and accountability are paramount. There may be debates over the legality of quoting images for propaganda, whether such images were created with permission, and how to determine whether an image was altered or generated rather than photorealistic. These debates highlight the need for clear and detectable alterations in the lessening of public trust in media.
To address these ethical and legal challenges, it may be necessary to implement steps such as declaring that image manipulation has occurred, adding clear author credits where applicable, and defining categories of permissible manipulation. By identifying and reporting such alterations, one can hold platforms accountable and ensure that they adhere to standards of photo accountability and objectivity.
Determining the exact categories of manipulation is challenging, but it is essential to recognize the four common changes: body manipulation, object manipulation, tone manipulation, and colour manipulation. Each category requires a responsible and discerning approach to ensure that all actions are documented and justified on an ethical basis.
Despite the difficulties, there are practical solutions to the ethical and legal issues posed by image manipulation. One widely discussed approach is to flag manipulated images and disclose specific alterations in writing. Additionally, platforms like Instagram have faced calls for censorship over the use of images created by their staff or other collaborators, who may have not approved of the edits.
The implications of image manipulation extend beyond the realm of platforms like Instagram; they also run afoul of commonly held values of photo authenticity and accountability. Platforms such as websites, Twitter, and Instagram might face backlash for enabling the manipulation of images of people and objects, including those who are universally doubted, such as images in照片 of objects in dangerous environments or even images of people outlined as models, which may have been altered to be unrealistic.