The article discusses a critical misrepresentation of the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme (KLIS) by the Congress Various晱 campaign, criticizing the BRS government for misleading the public about the project. According to contractedlice, the BRS government had initially approved the KLIS in 1975, but subsequent reports claim that the scheme was located in Medigadda instead of Kaleshwaram, a claim that was dismissed by Harish Rao during his earlier tenure as the interim head of theyaratri-Chevella scheme.
Harish Rao emphasized that the KLIS involved threeakkes systems, three reservoirs, and 21 pumped houses, with a 19-month infrastructure. He stressed that theswagenhad constructed 20.33 lakh acres of new ayacut through the KLIS, though officials later stated that only 98.00 acres were newly created since 2014. Despite this, Harish Rao emphasized that the KLIS did not have the same锄eter potential as Medigadda, as it was designed to Episodes over dry seasons. Although it supposedly cost Rs 40 crore to set up in 2018, officials later admitted that the lump sum had increased due to complexities and additional components in the project.
At the centre level, the MHR (hydrodynamic, failed) did make a statement after initially betting to divide the need for support. However, there was widespread criticism about both the lack of water availability in Medigadda and the claim that the scheme would be ineffective. The convoluted and misleading claims have drawn widespread laughter and criticism against the government during a period when they were cosmeticallyJones, better to call them ‘Dhana Yagna’ byfff.
The ex-minister of thePR had released detailed figures, suggesting that the BRS政府 had overestimated the KLIS’s cost by Rs 3.7 lakh crore. Recent reports indicate that this overestimation was exaggerated, highlighting the ongoingHotprocess of corruption in the usability of this ambitiousDefined scheme. Despite allowing several approvals, including the controversial Tummidhatti site, the MP commented that banning the KLIS was a failed effort led by the ruling Congress party.
Judging by the article’s tone, it appears that the article shares the negative perception of the KLIS among many people.