Exonerated Janitor Sues San Bernardino County After False Child Abuse Charges
In a shocking turn of events, Pedro Martinez, a former janitor at a Southern California elementary school, has been exonerated after nearly five years of wrongful imprisonment on allegations of sexual abuse against young boys. Released in December 2023 following a jury acquittal, Martinez is now pursuing legal action against multiple parties, including San Bernardino County and several law enforcement officials. His lawsuit, filed on behalf of himself and his wife, Juliette Mondragon de Martinez, alleges a conspiracy of lies, a severely flawed investigation, and numerous violations of his civil rights.
The lawsuit lays bare the injustices Martinez faced, arguing that he was unjustly accused by a self-admitted opioid addict with a lengthy criminal history who had previously made almost a dozen similar allegations against others. According to the complaint, county employees engaged in misconduct by hiding exculpatory evidence, producing fabricated evidence, and improperly coaching witnesses during the investigation and trial. Martinez asserts that these actions violated his 14th Amendment right to due process and his 4th Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures.
Martinez’s legal troubles began on January 22, 2019, when a report from the girlfriend of a mother at Maple Elementary School accused him of sexually abusing a 6-year-old boy. This allegation led to his arrest on multiple counts of child sexual abuse and his subsequent pre-trial detention. The time spent behind bars cost Martinez dearly, as he missed significant family events, including holidays, birthdays, and even the funeral of his brother, profoundly impacting his personal life and mental well-being.
The lawsuit highlights serious concerns regarding the integrity of the investigation led by the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department. It details how detectives reportedly coerced a young victim into confirming abuse by posing leading questions and issuing indirect threats. Allegedly, the child was rewarded with candy for corroborating the claims, raising ethical questions about the methods employed by law enforcement during such sensitive inquiries.
Furthermore, the case against Martinez lacked substantial evidence to support the allegations. Investigators did not find any incriminating material on his personal devices after conducting searches. Medical exams of the alleged victims turned up normal results, and no physical evidence or traces of assault were discovered in the locations where the alleged incidents reportedly took place. This stark absence of credible evidence raises serious doubts about the veracity of the claims against him.
Martinez’s attorney, Katherine McBroom, remarked that this case epitomizes the dangers of biased investigations that overlook fundamental legal protections. By pursuing this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California Eastern Division, Martinez and his wife aim to hold accountable those whose negligence and misconduct led to the wrongful prosecution of an innocent man and to prevent similar occurrences in the future. They seek both compensatory and punitive damages, hoping to obtain justice for the significant harm inflicted upon their family during this harrowing ordeal.