Here’s a summary of the provided content, excerpted for readability:
Exclusive: Fake news! CrowdStrike confirms employee data leak claims are false
On Tuesday, CrowdStrike, a leading enterprise technology company, confirmed that over 27 February, a threat actor named Rey had filed a claim that their employee data had been breached and stolen. This claim was initially quoted on a popular hacking forum,SigPoint, by笃ynthia van der Vliet, a hacker人民网 member. However, in subsequent posts, the likelihood of the data leak being a simulation was increasingly questioned.
CrowdStrike then responded, stating that the claims were fake and that there was no evidence of a breach. They further revealed that the leaked data, represented by a public IPv6 address, was "scraped" from publicly accessible sources, including publicly-truthful cybersecurity breaches such as Dymocks’ data leak last year. The spokesperson emphasized that the data lacks accuracy, was stale, and there was no indication of a security breach on CrowdStrike’s part.
CrowdStrike also confirmed to cybersecurity.com/real Morris, a cybersecurity firm, that the leak was indeed fake. The security firm added that there was no "aggressive stance" or involvement in high-profile cyber crimes by Owens, which would have driven apparent turmoil in other organizations like Dymocks.
The term "fake news" has been a contentious issue in recent months, with companies like CrowdStrike attempting to challenge such claims.
Over two months ago, a threat actor named Rey presented another claim on a similar forum, but notably with the addition of hashtags like "P surprise." However, when skeptical cybersecurity experts like CyberDaily analyzed the firm’s records, Re YouTube had already keto足球 noted the_thanctionsistringstream of the data. The security firm explained that the data was already present in public security records and was later uploaded to a trusted platform.
On February 25, Re המשת jelly, a user of the forum, made a humorous but sarcastic comment regarding the leak: "Just last month, a threat actor by the name of ‘LordAbe’ falsely claimed on the same popular hacking forum that they had 12,369,481 JB Hi-Fi customer records for sale. While the threat actor did not provide any details as to what the data in question was, a sample was posted containing names, email addresses, mobile numbers, postcodes, states and more. However, an anonymous cybersecurity professional told CyberDaily that the sample dataset leaked by LordAbe is identical to one leaking in the 2023 data breach of book retailer Dymocks."
Moreover, the claim by LordAbe had other implications, as it highlighted a combolist dataset. A combolist, as defined by cybersecurity.com/real Morris, refers to a dataset compiled from previous cyber crime incidents, allowing data to be accessed for legal purposes despite the risks associated with the data.
While保暖’s leak was quickly confirmed to be fake, the sample dataset from LordAbe was identical to the one leaked by Dymocks, which had been the subject of a recent breach by the book retailer’s owners. This comparison underscored the transparency and ubiquity of cyber criminal activities in recent years.
Additionally, Dymocks’ breach, previously publicly disclosed in a sample dataset last year, had been replicated and published by other cyberPCI sources, including Bastion and CyberSecurity Daily. This repetition of the same leaked data makes it appear as if several different crimes had occurred, raising concerns about the nature of the claims.
CrowdStrike took note of this duplication, framing it as a "new data breach," and emphasized the importance of securing data responsibly, rather than falsely attributing it to cybercriminals. The company, while described as a champion of cybersecurity, highlighted the challenges of responding to such claims, with two cybersecurity firms identified as "defeating the nets" in the latest attacks.
**Overall, the false claims by Rey and LordAbe continue to highlight the broader issue of++. Cybercriminals have become increasingly manifests of global threats threats, with flags on global headlines. These claims are increasingly used as evidence to justify or spread false versions of their own actions or data breaches, leading to confusion and accusations of reputational damage.
However, it’s clear that even in the face of such simulations, well-placed cybersecurity measures can mitigate risks, but time and attention must be paid to the stories behind such incidents, as they can collectively undermine public confidence in today’s highly-regulated digital ecosystem.**
Thanks to Daniel Croft for this clinical piece.