Cristobal Vehemently Defends Ward’s Bowl Game Decision Amidst "Quitting" Accusations
Miami Hurricanes head coach Mario Cristobal launched a fiery defense of quarterback Cam Ward’s decision to sit out the second half of the Pop-Tarts Bowl, a game which the Hurricanes ultimately lost to Iowa State. Ward, projected by some as the potential No. 1 overall pick in the 2025 NFL Draft, played only the first half before being replaced by Emory Williams. This sparked a wave of criticism and speculation, with some accusing Ward of "quitting" on his team. Cristobal, however, vehemently dismissed these accusations, labeling them as "bullshit" and a "false narrative." He insisted that the decision for Ward to sit out the second half was predetermined, based on his projected high draft status and the potential risk of injury.
Cristobal’s unwavering support for Ward extends beyond this single incident. He has consistently praised Ward’s contributions to the Hurricanes program, both on and off the field, despite the quarterback’s single-year tenure following his transfer to Miami. Cristobal highlighted Ward’s "spectacular" play, but emphasized the quarterback’s intangible qualities, including leadership, team-building skills, and mentorship of younger players. He lauded Ward’s dedication to film study and his ability to galvanize the team, describing him as an "exemplary" teammate and a positive influence on the program’s culture.
The decision to sit out the second half of the bowl game has inevitably fueled discussions about Ward’s draft prospects and his comparison to other top quarterback contenders, particularly Shedeur Sanders. Both quarterbacks are widely considered to be the frontrunners in the 2025 NFL Draft class, with ESPN analyst Field Yates describing the competition between them as "razor-thin." Yates ranks Sanders slightly higher on his overall draft board, placing him at No. 14 compared to Ward’s No. 17. However, Yates acknowledges the premium placed on quarterbacks in the NFL and predicts that both players will likely be selected early in the draft, especially given the quarterback needs of teams like the Giants and the Raiders.
The divergent styles of Ward and Sanders add an intriguing layer to the quarterback conversation. Yates describes Sanders as a polished pocket passer with exceptional accuracy and ball placement, highlighting his remarkable poise under pressure. Ward, on the other hand, is characterized as more of an improvisational quarterback, capable of creating plays outside the pocket and generating offense with his athleticism and strong arm. While both quarterbacks possess the poise necessary to succeed at the next level, their differing skillsets present NFL teams with distinct options, tailoring their draft decisions to their specific offensive schemes and philosophies.
The pre-draft process is still in its early stages, and the relative rankings of Ward and Sanders are subject to change. Combine performances, pro day workouts, and individual team interviews will all play a crucial role in shaping the final draft order. However, the consensus view appears to be that both quarterbacks possess the talent and potential to become franchise quarterbacks in the NFL. The contrasting styles of Ward and Sanders offer a fascinating dynamic to the 2025 draft, providing teams with a choice between a more traditional pocket passer and a dynamic playmaker capable of extending plays and creating opportunities outside the structured confines of the offense.
Cristobal’s staunch defense of Ward underscores the complexities of the situation. While some may view Ward’s decision as prioritizing his NFL future over his commitment to his college team, Cristobal frames it as a pragmatic choice made in consultation with the coaching staff. He emphasizes the importance of protecting Ward’s health and future prospects, especially considering his projected high draft position. The decision highlights the evolving landscape of college football, where the allure of the NFL and the potential for lucrative contracts can influence player decisions, particularly in the context of bowl games that lack the same significance as conference championships or playoff games. The debate surrounding Ward’s decision and Cristobal’s response reflects the ongoing tension between the traditions of college football and the increasing influence of the NFL.