Shane Smith’s Post-Bankruptcy Vice: A Descent into Disinformation and Conspiracy?
Once a lauded media disruptor, Vice Media, under the renewed leadership of co-founder Shane Smith, appears to be charting a controversial new course. Following Vice’s bankruptcy, sale, and mass layoffs, Smith has returned as CEO, launching a new interview show, "Shane Smith Has Questions." The show, ostensibly dedicated to uncovering truth in a world awash in misinformation, has instead become a platform for promoting conspiracy theories, questionable sources, and right-wing narratives, raising concerns about Smith’s intentions and the journalistic integrity of the once-respected media outlet.
Smith’s show has tackled a range of hot-button issues, from immigration to COVID-19 vaccines, but its approach has been characterized by a distinct lack of journalistic rigor. Episodes on immigration have featured anti-immigration think tank representatives and promoted tropes about illegal border crossings, while a segment on the assassination attempt against Donald Trump entertained unsubstantiated claims of a second shooter and a "Deep State" cover-up. Furthermore, Smith has expressed skepticism about COVID-19 vaccines, suggesting undisclosed side effects and government cover-ups, echoing common conspiracy theories.
This shift in editorial direction coincides with a broader rightward turn by Smith. He has publicly apologized to Elon Musk for Vice’s past criticism, attributing it to a "woke" agenda, and has expressed a desire to connect with a more conservative audience. Reports indicate that his producers have reached out to right-wing podcasters and "manosphere" personalities in an attempt to book them on the show, emphasizing that Smith’s previous "woke" persona was merely a façade.
This new iteration of Vice, and Smith’s show in particular, raises serious questions about the company’s commitment to factual reporting and its journalistic standards. Smith’s reliance on dubious sources, his embrace of conspiracy theories, and his apparent courting of a conservative audience suggest a deliberate move away from the investigative journalism that once defined Vice. While Smith presents himself as a seeker of truth, his methods and chosen narratives often serve to obfuscate rather than illuminate, potentially contributing to the very disinformation he claims to be fighting.
The trajectory of Vice under Smith’s renewed leadership is a stark contrast to the company’s earlier accomplishments. Vice News once garnered acclaim for its groundbreaking reporting on immigration, corporate corruption, and the far-right, even winning a Peabody Award in 2017. Smith’s return, however, seems to mark a departure from these journalistic principles. His show’s focus on sensationalism, conspiracy, and right-wing narratives raises concerns about the future of Vice and its role in the media landscape.
Whether Smith’s rightward shift is a genuine change of heart or a calculated business strategy remains unclear. However, his show’s content suggests a prioritization of appealing to a new, more conservative audience over maintaining journalistic integrity. This raises critical questions about the future of Vice and the potential consequences of its embrace of disinformation and conspiracy theories. The once-lauded media outlet now appears to be contributing to the very problem it claims to be addressing, raising concerns about its impact on public discourse and trust in media.