Denmark: A Peripheral Target in the Crosshairs of Russian Disinformation
Denmark, while not a primary target of Russian disinformation campaigns, remains within the scope of influence operations emanating from Moscow. Although public attribution of specific disinformation cases directly impacting Danish audiences or interests has been limited, the potential for spillover effects from campaigns targeting other nations is significant, particularly in the interconnected digital landscape. This dynamic is further complicated by the fact that target audiences for disinformation aren’t solely defined by nationality, but also by political leanings, media consumption habits, and perspectives on global affairs. While Danish security services haven’t detected systematic interference in recent elections, the ongoing presence of Russian attempts to sway public opinion underscores the need for continued vigilance.
The narrative around Russian disinformation in Denmark is characterized by a nuanced understanding of the threat. Public threat assessments prior to the 2024 European Parliament elections highlighted Russia and, for the first time, China as potential actors, though interference was deemed less likely. Post-election analysis confirmed the absence of coordinated influence campaigns. Despite this, Russia continues to be recognized as the primary source of disinformation threats, outpacing concerns related to Chinese influence operations, which encompass issues like espionage and cyberattacks. This assessment reinforces the importance of focusing on Russian disinformation activities in the Danish context.
The fluid nature of the information environment allows disinformation to transcend geographical boundaries, permeating digital platforms, online gaming communities, and social media networks. Consequently, even disinformation efforts not explicitly aimed at Denmark can still resonate with segments of the Danish population, highlighting the interconnectedness of the global information ecosystem. The influence of such campaigns is amplified by the targeting of specific demographic groups based on factors such as political views, media consumption patterns, and attitudes towards international events, rather than relying solely on nationality.
Domestically, Denmark, like many other European nations, experienced a surge in conspiratorial thinking during the COVID-19 pandemic. This phenomenon, observed across numerous countries, manifested in the Danish information sphere through the convergence of anti-vaccine sentiments with anti-Ukraine stances following Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022. This overlap underscores the susceptibility of certain groups to manipulative narratives. Despite strong public and governmental support for Ukraine, anti-Ukraine sentiment and pro-appeasement rhetoric persist on Danish social media platforms, raising questions about the origin of such narratives – whether organically generated or fueled by Russian or pro-Russian actors.
The difficulty in distinguishing between organic and externally influenced online activity presents a significant challenge in assessing the true impact of Russian disinformation in Denmark. While overt, coordinated campaigns may be absent, the potential for subtle, insidious influence operations remains. The existence of even a small number of emblematic disinformation cases targeting Denmark demonstrates that the country is not entirely off the radar of Russian influence operations. This underscores the need for continued monitoring and analysis of the evolving disinformation landscape.
The overall picture of Russian disinformation in Denmark depicts a nation on the periphery of targeted campaigns, yet still susceptible to spillover effects and more subtle forms of influence. The interconnected nature of the digital information environment, coupled with the targeting of specific demographics based on shared characteristics beyond nationality, complicates the task of accurately assessing the extent of Russian disinformation impact. While Denmark has not been a primary target, the presence of documented cases and the potential for future influence operations warrant ongoing vigilance and a nuanced understanding of the evolving disinformation threat landscape.