Close Menu
Web StatWeb Stat
  • Home
  • News
  • United Kingdom
  • Misinformation
  • Disinformation
  • AI Fake News
  • False News
  • Guides
Trending

6 fake ‘S’pore news’ websites operated by foreign actors blocked by govt over potential hostile misinformation campaigns – Mothership.SG

April 23, 2026

Ukraine busts ‘bot farm’ supplying thousands of fake Telegram accounts to Russian spies

April 23, 2026

IMO Tackles False Flagging: New Guidelines for Ship Registration Transparency – News and Statistics

April 23, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web StatWeb Stat
  • Home
  • News
  • United Kingdom
  • Misinformation
  • Disinformation
  • AI Fake News
  • False News
  • Guides
Subscribe
Web StatWeb Stat
Home»Misinformation
Misinformation

Bay County officials clarify ‘misinformation’ involving St. Andrews School property

News RoomBy News RoomApril 23, 20265 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Telegram Email LinkedIn Tumblr

The digital age, while connecting us in unprecedented ways, also presents a unique challenge: the rapid spread of misinformation. This was vividly illustrated in Bay County, Florida, where a local treasure, the St. Andrews School property, became the unwitting target of a social media storm. The community, brimming with civic pride and a deep appreciation for its history, suddenly found itself in a flurry of concern, believing that their historic landmark was on the verge of being sold and potentially stripped of its protective status. This wasn’t just a simple misunderstanding; it was a testament to how quickly an unverified post can ignite a passionate community, creating ripples of anxiety and demanding immediate clarification from local authorities.

The heart of the matter lay in a Facebook post by Panama City Commissioner Josh Street. While undoubtedly well-intentioned, his comments unfortunately contained inaccuracies that quickly spiraled into widespread alarm. The community, upon seeing this post, reacted as any engaged citizenry would – with a flurry of calls, emails, and public comments, all directed at their county commissioners. Their message was clear, unwavering, and impassioned: preserve the St. Andrews School. This grassroots outcry wasn’t just about a building; it was about safeguarding a tangible link to their past, a cornerstone of their shared identity, and a beloved local icon. The sheer volume of this public response highlighted the profound connection the community felt to this historic property and their dedication to its continued existence.

County officials, caught in the crosshairs of this unforeseen tempest, soon realized the gravity of the situation. They immediately stepped forward to set the record straight. Their clarification was simple yet crucial: there was no impending sale in the way the public was led to believe. They explained that there had been an “unsolicited bid” – a verbal expression of interest from an individual in buying the property. However, county law dictates a rigorous formal public bidding process for such transactions to even commence. This process had been initiated, with a clear deadline. What’s more, even though the bidding window was slated to close soon, not a single formal bid had been submitted, not even from the party who had initially expressed interest. This crucial detail alone debunked the immediate fear of an imminent, under-the-table sale.

Perhaps the most visceral concern among the community, fueled by the initial misinformation, was the belief that the deed restrictions protecting St. Andrews School as a national historic landmark had been removed. This was a fear that struck at the very core of the building’s historical integrity. County officials, understanding the depth of this apprehension, addressed it directly and unequivocally on Tuesday. They made it abundantly clear: “that was not the case, and there have been no deed changes.” This assurance was a sigh of relief for many, a powerful affirmation that the building’s historical protections remained firmly in place, uncompromised and untouched. It was a testament to the fact that while verbal interest might surface, the legal frameworks designed to protect historical assets were robust and actively enforced.

In a move that spoke volumes about his character and commitment to public service, Josh Street, the unwitting catalyst of the social media stir, quickly and commendably issued another Facebook post. This time, his message was one of correction and apology. He expressed regret for the “tension and extra work” that his previous, inaccurate post had inadvertently caused both the county administration and its residents. This act of accountability was crucial. It not only helped to further quell the anxieties but also underscored the human element of public discourse – the potential for error, and the importance of owning and rectifying those mistakes, especially when they impact an entire community.

Looking ahead, county officials, while still acknowledging the property’s uncertain future, were resolute in their commitment to its historical value. Bay County Commissioner Doug Crosby articulated this sentiment powerfully: “I have no interest in seeing the building torn down… I have no intention or interest in seeing the building destroyed. As a matter of fact, I would like to see the historical value retained.” County Manager Joel Schubert further reinforced this, directly addressing the misinformation: “Unfortunately, there was some misinformation on social media, and I would like to address just two things on that quickly. One, there were no protections in the deed with regard to the historic preservation or the registry that were removed. There were no deed restrictions removed.” They also reassured the public that should any significant changes regarding the property occur, the county’s standard meeting processes, which always include ample opportunities for public input, would be followed. This commitment to transparency and community involvement was a promise that the public’s voice would continue to be heard, ensuring that the fate of the St. Andrews School would be decided not in a vacuum, but through an open and democratic process. This incident, while initially unsettling, ultimately served as a powerful reminder of the delicate balance between information, community engagement, and the diligent work of public servants in safeguarding both the present and the past.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
News Room
  • Website

Keep Reading

6 fake ‘S’pore news’ websites operated by foreign actors blocked by govt over potential hostile misinformation campaigns – Mothership.SG

Researcher warns of coming wave of AI health misinformation

Expert says doctors could be key to halting vax hesitancy – The West Australian

Misinformation about the safety of ingredients used in Dawn dishwashing liquid.

Mozambique: Two Monapo health centres still closed after cholera misinformation threats

AI expert shares how to build a sharper mind in a misinformation age

Editors Picks

Ukraine busts ‘bot farm’ supplying thousands of fake Telegram accounts to Russian spies

April 23, 2026

IMO Tackles False Flagging: New Guidelines for Ship Registration Transparency – News and Statistics

April 23, 2026

Researcher warns of coming wave of AI health misinformation

April 23, 2026

Expert raises alarm on hybrid warfare

April 23, 2026

Iran rejects Trump’s remarks on halted executions of eight women as ‘false news’

April 23, 2026

Latest Articles

Government working to prevent misinformation and disinformation: State Minister for Information and Broadcasting

April 23, 2026

Bay County officials clarify ‘misinformation’ involving St. Andrews School property

April 23, 2026

Home Affairs Dismisses False Claims of Passport-Free Entry for Lesotho Nationals

April 23, 2026

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
Copyright © 2026 Web Stat. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.