A Family Divided: Fred Trump III’s Insider Account of the Trump Dynasty
Fred C. Trump III’s memoir, "All In The Family," offers a compelling, albeit troubling, glimpse into the inner workings of the Trump family, revealing a complex web of rivalries, betrayals, and shocking pronouncements. The book centers around the author’s relationship with his uncle, former President Donald J. Trump, painting a portrait of a man driven by an insatiable need to win, often at the expense of others, even within his own family. The narrative begins with a seemingly innocuous childhood anecdote, where a young Fred III witnesses his uncle’s furious reaction to a vandalized car, punctuated by the use of a racial slur. This incident, according to the author, foreshadows the racially charged rhetoric that would later define Donald Trump’s political career.
While Trump’s 2024 campaign spokesperson, Stephen Cheung, vehemently denies the allegation, dismissing it as "fake news," Fred III’s account resonates with numerous instances of Trump’s publicly documented controversial statements about race and ethnicity. From questioning Kamala Harris’s racial identity to making generalizations about certain groups of people, Trump’s words, as noted by scholars like Jennifer Ho, often echo historical patterns of racial prejudice and boundary policing. Furthermore, Fred III’s claim finds an unsettling parallel in journalist Michael Wolff’s account of Steve Bannon’s belief that Trump, while not necessarily antisemitic, could easily be imagined using racial slurs. Despite the gravity of the accusation, Fred III ultimately equivocates, attributing the incident to the prevailing social climate of 1970s Queens, a time he describes as rife with casual prejudice.
This ambivalence is a recurring theme in Fred III’s narrative, which stands in stark contrast to the more scathing portrayal presented by his sister, Mary L. Trump, in her 2020 memoir, "Too Much and Never Enough." While acknowledging the fallout from his sister’s book, and the family’s attempts to suppress its publication, Fred III distances himself from her approach, emphasizing his desire to maintain some semblance of a relationship with his relatives. This desire for reconciliation, perhaps, explains the measured tone of his memoir, a blend of personal anecdotes, family history, and critical observations. Although the book may not offer groundbreaking revelations, it provides a unique perspective on the Trump family dynamics, shedding light on the formative influences and interpersonal conflicts that have shaped their individual trajectories.
Fred III’s central argument is that the Trump family, in its dysfunction and its triumphs, serves as a microcosm of American society, reflecting its strengths and weaknesses. He acknowledges the polarizing nature of his family name, and the potential for his book to further strain family relations. However, he insists on his right to tell his story, highlighting his own flaws and acknowledging his limitations as a narrator, a gesture of self-awareness that he believes sets him apart from his relatives. The memoir explores several key questions: the origins of the family’s narcissism, the obsession with winning at all costs, and the transactional nature of Trump loyalty. These questions are framed within the context of Fred Trump Sr., the family patriarch, whose influence, according to Fred III, is crucial to understanding the personalities of his five children, including Donald.
Fred III depicts his grandfather as a domineering figure who fostered competition and instilled a win-at-all-costs mentality in his children. This ethos, he argues, is particularly evident in Donald Trump, whose ambition and drive, according to Fred III, masked a lack of empathy and intellectual depth. The author illustrates this point with the bitter dispute over his grandfather’s will in 1999. Following a series of financial setbacks, Donald Trump spearheaded efforts to disinherit Fred III and his sister, Mary, leading to a protracted legal battle. The family’s response to the lawsuit, as recounted by Fred III, was nothing short of cruel, culminating in the termination of his family’s medical insurance, a devastating blow given his youngest son’s lifelong neurological disability.
Perhaps the most disturbing revelation in the memoir concerns two separate conversations Fred III had with his uncle, then President Trump, regarding his son William’s medical expenses. In the first instance, Donald Trump allegedly suggested that Fred III "let him die" and move to Florida. Years later, in a second conversation, the president reportedly reiterated this sentiment, expressing concern about the "expenses" associated with people with disabilities, suggesting they should "just die." These chilling remarks, according to Fred III, demonstrate a callous disregard for human life, prioritizing financial considerations over the well-being of vulnerable individuals. These alleged conversations, coupled with other instances of perceived cruelty and indifference, have led Fred III to publicly declare his intention to vote for Kamala Harris in the upcoming election. His memoir ultimately serves as a complex and unsettling exploration of family dynamics, ambition, and the enduring legacy of the Trump name.