Close Menu
Web StatWeb Stat
  • Home
  • News
  • United Kingdom
  • Misinformation
  • Disinformation
  • AI Fake News
  • False News
  • Guides
Trending

‘Captain Shiv Kumar not recalled’: Govt busts misinformation campaign, says Defence Attaché still posted in Jakarta

July 8, 2025

Is Russia really ‘grooming’ Western AI? | Media

July 8, 2025

Kremlin openly preparing for future wars – NSDC Center for Countering Disinformation

July 8, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web StatWeb Stat
  • Home
  • News
  • United Kingdom
  • Misinformation
  • Disinformation
  • AI Fake News
  • False News
  • Guides
Subscribe
Web StatWeb Stat
Home»False News
False News

Trump Campaign Defends Controversial “Shoot Through the Fake News” Remark

News RoomBy News RoomNovember 4, 2024Updated:December 8, 20243 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Telegram Email LinkedIn Tumblr

Trump Stirs Controversy with "Shoot Through the Fake News" Remark at Pennsylvania Rally

Former President Donald Trump ignited a firestorm of criticism on Sunday after suggesting at a Pennsylvania rally that he wouldn’t mind if someone had to "shoot through the fake news" to reach him. The remark, delivered while Trump was complaining about the bulletproof glass surrounding his lectern, immediately drew condemnation from political opponents and media organizations alike. This latest attack on the press comes amidst a pattern of escalating rhetoric from the former President as he campaigns for a return to the White House in 2024.

The controversial comment came as Trump pointed to the bulletproof glass shielding him from the crowd. "I have a piece of glass over here, and I don’t have a piece of glass there. And I have this piece of glass here, but all we have really over here is the fake news," he said, gesturing towards the assembled journalists. He then added, "And to get me somebody would have to shoot through the fake news. And I don’t mind that so much. I don’t mind that." The Secret Service implemented the protective glass measures following an assassination attempt against Trump at a rally in Butler, Pennsylvania, in July.

Trump’s campaign spokesperson, Steven Cheung, later attempted to defend the remarks, claiming they were taken out of context and actually referred to the threats Trump faces. Cheung argued that Trump was implying the media were inadvertently placed in danger by being positioned between him and potential threats, thus needing protection themselves. He stated, "The president’s statement about protective glass placement has nothing to do with the media being harmed, or anything else. It was about threats against him that were spurred on by dangerous rhetoric from Democrats. In fact, President Trump was stating that the media was in danger, in that they were protecting him and, therefore, were in great danger themselves, and should have had a glass protective shield."

However, critics contend that Trump’s words, regardless of intent, were reckless and irresponsible, potentially inciting violence against journalists. This is not the first time Trump has targeted the media. Throughout his political career, he has consistently labeled the press as "fake news," "dishonest," and "the enemy of the people." This persistent demonization of the media, opponents argue, creates a hostile environment for journalists and undermines the public’s trust in credible news sources.

While Trump’s campaign downplayed the comments, the incident highlighted the stark contrast between the Republican frontrunner and his Democratic rivals. As Trump delivered his controversial remarks, Vice President Kamala Harris’s campaign noted that she was attending church and engaging in community service. This juxtaposition served to underscore the differing approaches and priorities of the two potential presidential candidates.

The "shoot through the fake news" comment is the latest in a series of inflammatory statements from Trump that have drawn criticism for their divisive nature. He has increasingly targeted opponents, using inflammatory language and personal attacks. This rhetoric, coupled with previous instances of violence at Trump rallies, raises concerns about the potential for escalating tensions and further polarization of the political landscape. The incident reignites the debate surrounding the responsibility of political leaders to temper their language and avoid inciting violence, especially in a climate of heightened political animosity. The long-term consequences of such rhetoric on the political discourse and the safety of journalists remain to be seen.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
News Room
  • Website

Keep Reading

‘False Narrative’: Ex-SEBI Chief Madhabi Puri Buch Says Jane Street Probe Began Under Her Watch

Jane Street Case: Madhabi Puri Buch Slams ‘False Narrative’, Says Probe Initiated Under Her Watch | Business News

ICMAI warns about Fake News

False posts share AI-generated news report about Iran ‘surrendering’ to Israel

IndiGo Indore-Raipur Flight Makes Emergency Landing After Mid-Air False Alarm | India News

Vehicle imports : Govt warns public of false news

Editors Picks

Is Russia really ‘grooming’ Western AI? | Media

July 8, 2025

Kremlin openly preparing for future wars – NSDC Center for Countering Disinformation

July 8, 2025

‘False Narrative’: Ex-SEBI Chief Madhabi Puri Buch Says Jane Street Probe Began Under Her Watch

July 8, 2025

Cancer care has created a vacuum for misinformation to flourish

July 8, 2025

Sharon Srivastava: How a Disinformation Campaign Takes Hold

July 8, 2025

Latest Articles

Jane Street Case: Madhabi Puri Buch Slams ‘False Narrative’, Says Probe Initiated Under Her Watch | Business News

July 8, 2025

ICMAI warns about Fake News

July 8, 2025

What is the truth about Defence Attaché?

July 8, 2025

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
Copyright © 2025 Web Stat. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.