San Francisco Schools Grapple with Immigration Fears in the Wake of Trump’s Re-election
San Francisco, a city known for its progressive stance and sanctuary city policy, found itself grappling with a wave of immigration-related anxieties following the re-election of former President Donald Trump. A false rumor about an ICE agent boarding a Muni bus to apprehend a student sparked widespread concern and highlighted the challenges faced by the San Francisco Unified School District (SFUSD) in addressing the fears of its diverse student body. While the incident proved to be a misunderstanding – a law enforcement officer retrieving a lost child – it underscored the pervasive apprehension among immigrant families in the city. The incident also exposed communication gaps within the school district, prompting Superintendent Maria Su to implement clearer reporting protocols for future incidents.
The Muni bus incident was not an isolated event. Numerous unsubstantiated reports of ICE sightings circulated among parents through messaging apps, fueling anxieties and prompting some, like Karen Rodriguez, a Colombian asylum seeker, to abandon the platform altogether. Rodriguez, whose seven-year-old son attends an SFUSD school, expressed her ongoing fear and uncertainty in the face of potential immigration enforcement actions. Despite these concerns, she remained resolute in ensuring her son’s education continued uninterrupted.
Superintendent Su publicly apologized for the district’s hasty response to the Muni incident and acknowledged the need for greater caution and verification before disseminating information. The incident served as a wake-up call, prompting a reassessment of communication strategies within the district. The Board of Education president, Phil Kim, echoed Su’s sentiments, emphasizing the importance of avoiding actions that could exacerbate confusion and fear among students and families. The incident provided a stark reminder of the delicate balance between responding to potential threats and avoiding the spread of misinformation.
San Francisco, with its established sanctuary city policy limiting cooperation with ICE, anticipated being a target of the Trump administration’s immigration enforcement efforts. While school attendance remained stable, the city took proactive steps to safeguard resources. The Board of Supervisors expedited the acceptance of over $130 million in federal grants before the new administration could potentially rescind them. This proactive measure demonstrated the city’s commitment to protecting vital programs and services for its residents.
In response to heightened anxieties, the Office of Civic Engagement and Immigrant Affairs (OCEIA) and SFUSD focused on disseminating existing resources and promoting awareness of family preparedness measures. The Rapid Response Network was highlighted as a crucial resource for verifying ICE activity, providing legal assistance to detainees, and connecting individuals with essential resources for immigration cases and applications. OCEIA also encouraged community members to actively share know-your-rights materials and stressed the importance of continuing to utilize public services without fear.
The SFUSD reaffirmed its commitment to its own sanctuary policy, which prohibits recording students’ immigration status and restricts cooperation with immigration officials. The district conducted reviews and provided training for administrators to ensure adherence to the policy. While some schools organized know-your-rights workshops and provided guidance to high school students, the United Educators of San Francisco (UESF) called for a more comprehensive and coordinated approach across all schools. UESF Treasurer Geri Almanza advocated for family meetings during school advisory periods, emphasizing the importance of teachers and social workers as trusted sources of information. Concerns were also raised about the need for clearer communication and support for families in developing contingency plans, such as arranging for backup childcare.
The SFUSD collaborated with the City Attorney’s office to establish a formal agreement for investigating reports of immigration enforcement actions. This collaboration aimed to provide a more coordinated and effective response to potential threats. The district also sought to expand legal access for students and families, recognizing the crucial role of legal representation in navigating immigration-related challenges. Superintendent Su acknowledged the widespread anxiety and stress within the school community and reiterated the district’s dedication to providing a safe and inclusive environment for all students, regardless of immigration status.
Despite these efforts, some critics argued that the SFUSD was slow to respond to the post-election climate of fear. The Los Angeles Unified School District, for example, launched a "We Are One" campaign and distributed handbooks with detailed instructions for family preparedness, know-your-rights information, and resources for accessing legal assistance, among others. The contrast between the two districts’ responses highlighted the urgency of providing timely and comprehensive support to immigrant families. While the SFUSD eventually compiled resources on its website, the delay raised concerns about the district’s preparedness and responsiveness to the needs of its diverse student population. Community organizers emphasized the importance of not only preparing for potential enforcement actions but also developing strategies for reacting to events as they unfold, building strong relationships between educators and immigrant families, and acknowledging the ongoing uncertainty surrounding future immigration policies.