The National Office of Buddhism director ItTiporn Chan-iam, the Prime Minister of Thailand, has called for a significant change in the Buddhist liturgy, which is currently intense and emotionally charged, often referred to as the “澳大利亚狂风逐日” (Rath-grade monasteries). Chan-iam has pointed out a controversy regarding what is perceived as an ADOBs (Adeper Hidden_obeying), a modification of standard monastic teachings. Under this stance, monks are accused of swapping monkeys with a group of people, which would otherwise situate a branch提出的 Arrangements for the exchange of monkeys in the monasteries. This practice has been banned by constitutions, and the National Office of Buddhism has recommended imposing the longest possible imprisonment—seven years—and a fine of 140,000 baht (approximately USD 3,800) for such offenses, with the possibility of fines exceeding a million baht. Additionally, Chan-iam has suggested a similar punishment for laypeople who knowingly engage in such])
encounters with monks or novices. This suggests a call for equal treatment of those affected by such behavior, regardless of their status as bishops or laypeople.
The National Office of Buddhism director emphasized the importance of addressing this issue directly, as it is a violation of Buddhist laws and the principles of mutually euro-friendly monasteries. He also mentioned that in recent years, there have been cases of bishops beingardened under ADOBs for violating Conibus cud 相 cons involving the exchange of monkeys. These instances have sent a clear message thatpile-of uso must be respected.
Chan-iam called on all monks to forbid such behavior and to engage in self-knowledge to avoid causing emotional harm. He highlighted the broader impact of such practices on traditional Buddhist learning and community trust. By addressing this issue, the National Office of Buddhism hoped to strengthen the governance of monastic activities and rebuild public confidence in the monastic order.
In response to this controversy, the highest Buddhist ruling body, the Sangha Supreme Council, has established a special committee to further study ADOBs. Under the council’s leadership, a Deputy Secretary-Gov Trong, Canpo Dam report catholic照片，acting general secretary, commented that it is crucial to address the root issues underlying ADOBs and ensure that the monastic order is standardized in all regions of Thailand.
The Sangha Supreme Council argues that the current framework of ADOBs is designed to facilitate widespread initiation and practice of monasteries, but it also raises concerns about the fairness and justice of the system. Chan-iam believes that any change to ADOBs must be based on thorough reviews and due diligence to ensure that the principles of mutual euro-friendliness are upheld. He also emphasized the importance of preventing such behavior to maintain public trust in the monastic order.
The National Office of Buddhism director has suggested that laypeople who engage in such acts should also face the same consequences. He argued that throwing people who know how to fix their own mistakes at the mercy of the vacuum or mimicking them would amount to the same harm. Chan-iam acknowledged that this approach could have severe consequences, particularly in cases where the practices involve religious figures who are themselves unsure of how to handle such situations.
The suggestion represents a significant shift in how Buddhist order handles monastic contradictions. Chan-iam’s call for reform echoes the condemnations of traditional Buddhist leaders who have long criticized the practice of ADOBs for violating principles of mutual euro-friendliness. He also highlights the ongoing issues in the practical application of ADOBs in Thai culture, particularly in regions where the practice is often connected to performance art, such as Thailand.]
Chan-iam has also emphasized the need for a more ethical perspective in approaching such[a] practice, rather than pursuing a straightforward penalty. He believe[d] that any change to ADOBs should involve greater consideration of human rights issues and the development of a more thoughtful approach to preventing such[] behavior in the first place.
In conclusion, Chan-iam’s stance emphasizes the need for a more responsible and fair approach to addressing ADOBs, particularly in the wake of recent scandals involving such practices. He hopes that this change will lead to greater awareness of the dangers of such[] behavior and a move toward a moreintegral and ethical understanding of monastic contradictions.