In a critical statement made during an Upper House session on December 3, Japan’s Internal Affairs Minister, Seiichiro Murakami, addressed the rising issue of false information disseminated through social media during election periods. This warning comes in light of two significant local elections held in November—the Hyogo gubernatorial election and the Nagoya mayoral election—where some candidates found themselves the unwitting targets of misleading and spurious comments circulated online. Murakami emphasized that those who knowingly spread false information or campaign on behalf of rival candidates could face legal repercussions under Japan’s election law.
The context of Murakami’s remarks was specifically centered on the re-election campaign of Hyogo Governor Motohiko Saito. One prominent figure in the controversy was Takashi Tachibana, leader of a political organization that opposes Japan’s national broadcaster, NHK. Tachibana engaged in what has been dubbed “two-horsepower campaigning,” where he effectively acted as a simultaneous supporter and detractor, rallying for Saito while undermining other candidates. This tactic not only drew public criticism but also raised questions about the ethical implications involved in modern political campaigning.
During the session, Kiyomi Tsujimoto, a member of the main opposition Constitutional Democratic Party of Japan, raised concerns over the potential for candidates to both support certain individuals in the election and actively seek to sabotage their competitors. Tsujimoto’s inquiry highlighted a growing worry within political circles about the impact of social media on the integrity of election processes, given that misinformation can spread rapidly and influence voter perception and behavior.
In responding to these concerns, Murakami cited a specific provision of the Public Offices Election Law that addresses the consequences of spreading false information regarding electoral candidates. He made it clear that these regulations extend to online platforms, including social media sites, where misinformation can proliferate without checks and balances. This move to enforce existing laws in the digital realm underscores the government’s commitment to maintaining fair electoral practices amid the challenges posed by the internet.
Murakami pointed out that the duties and limits imposed on candidates who engage in campaigning are clearly defined by election law, which stipulates restrictions on the use of promotional posters and the number of speakers allowed at campaign events. Such stipulations not only aim to ensure a level playing field but also protect the candidates from unethical interference by rivals. He noted that any actions that contravene these laws would be evaluated based on factual evidence presented in each case.
As the discussions around the influence of social media and misinformation continue to gain prominence, Murakami’s comments signal a pivotal moment for Japanese politics. His reaffirmation of the potential legal consequences for those who misrepresent facts during campaigns suggests that lawmakers are keenly aware of the need for regulation in an evolving digital landscape. As the next election cycle approaches, candidates and their supporters might need to navigate this complex scenario carefully, keeping in mind that the lines between legitimate campaigning and illicit activities are increasingly scrutinized.