NCAA President’s Testimony on Transgender Athletes Sparks Controversy
Washington, D.C. – The Independent Council on Women’s Sport (ICONS) has accused NCAA President Charlie Baker of providing false testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee regarding the inclusion of transgender athletes in women’s sports. During his testimony on December 17, 2024, Baker asserted that federal courts had consistently upheld the NCAA’s policies allowing transgender women to compete in women’s sports. ICONS vehemently disputes this claim, arguing that Baker misrepresented the court’s rulings and the NCAA’s actual legal obligations.
ICONS Co-founder Kim Jones condemned Baker’s testimony, stating that the NCAA president "repeatedly lied to the Senate" and prioritized "revenue and power over truth, fairness, and the protection of female athletes." Jones emphasized that the NCAA is actively choosing to defend the inclusion of transgender women in women’s sports, rather than advocating for the rights and safety of female athletes. This, she argues, demonstrates a clear disregard for the fairness and integrity of women’s sports.
The core of the dispute lies in Baker’s interpretation of federal court decisions. Under questioning by Senators John Kennedy and Josh Hawley, Baker claimed that "five federal judges have all sided with participation" in the past two years. ICONS counters that no federal judge has specifically ruled on the legality of the NCAA’s transgender eligibility policies. They further assert that some federal judges have upheld laws banning men from women’s sports, demonstrating a legal precedent that the NCAA is choosing to ignore.
ICONS further challenges Baker’s claim that federal law requires the NCAA to permit biological men to participate in women’s sports. They argue that no federal court has issued such an order to the NCAA. When challenged by Senator Hawley on this point, Baker referenced the San Jose State case, claiming that the court’s decision supported his assertion. However, ICONS points out that the NCAA was not a party to this case, and the judge’s decision was based on procedural grounds, specifically the timing of the lawsuit, not on the merits of the case itself.
ICONS highlights that the judge in the San Jose State case actually acknowledged the potential merit of the plaintiffs’ legal challenge, suggesting that female athletes have legitimate grounds to contest policies allowing transgender women in women’s sports. Despite this, Baker presented the case as a mandate for inclusion, which ICONS claims is a gross misrepresentation of the facts.
ICONS maintains that the NCAA is not legally obligated to include transgender women in women’s sports and is actively choosing to prioritize inclusion over the concerns of female athletes. They argue that the NCAA is forcing women to compete against biological males, putting them at a disadvantage and potentially jeopardizing their safety. ICONS is currently supporting female athletes in two lawsuits against the NCAA and the Mountain West Conference, challenging the inclusion of transgender women in women’s sports. The organization, backed by athletes, parents, scientists, and legal experts, aims to protect the integrity and fairness of women’s sports and ensure the safety and opportunity of female athletes. They are actively seeking public support for their legal challenges and encourage those interested in learning more or contributing to the cause to visit their website.