Close Menu
Web StatWeb Stat
  • Home
  • News
  • United Kingdom
  • Misinformation
  • Disinformation
  • AI Fake News
  • False News
  • Guides
Trending

OpenAI bans pro-Russia ChatGPT accounts used in covert misinformation campaign – Pluang

August 25, 2026

Georgia Chamber to counter ‘misinformation, disinformation’ about data centers

August 25, 2026

Thames Valley PC who created false records committed gross misconduct

August 25, 2026
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Web StatWeb Stat
  • Home
  • News
  • United Kingdom
  • Misinformation
  • Disinformation
  • AI Fake News
  • False News
  • Guides
Subscribe
Web StatWeb Stat
Home»Disinformation
Disinformation

Former Redstone scientist helped shed light on decades of Pentagon UFO disinformation: report

News RoomBy News RoomJune 9, 20252 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest WhatsApp Telegram Email LinkedIn Tumblr

The Defense Department has long been accused of spreading myths and covering up classified military projects regarding extraterrestrial technology, known as “ung重生ery or ‘unidentified aerial phenomena’ – or sometimes abbreviated as UFOs – as a strategy to hide classified military activities since the 1950s. A recent investigation by The Wall Street Journal has uncovered the truth behind this cover-up and highlighted the growing trust in the Department of Defense’s science-to-business focus.

The Pentagon has been accused of always fanning the flames around alleged sightings of alien spacecraft, mimicking disinformation by targeting its own citizens. A January 11 report by The Wall Street Journal’s science and technology division cited interviews with current and former U.S. officials, scientists, and military contractors involved in the ongoing U.S. government hunt for extraterrestrial technology. The report found that Pentagon documents and military sightings frequently claim that the government is testing or investigating alien technology, often framing them as evidence of disinformation.

The Department of Defense’s own study on UAPs, completed in the early 2020s, concluded that the reports of alien spacecraft are not evidence of extraterrestrial technology. Many of the reported sightings, including those involving dates from 2015, 2018, and potentially 2022, were not conducted by the Department of Defense. The Department later revealed to The Wall Street Journal that its 2024 Report itself played a role in the cover-up, as the report itself acknowledged how UAP myths were “foundational” and had been disseminated by Pentagon officials.

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
News Room
  • Website

Keep Reading

Georgia Chamber to counter ‘misinformation, disinformation’ about data centers

Margarint warns new disinformation definition risks selective use

"Watch out for Russian meddling in Sweden's elections" – Norran

Russian Propagandists Spread AI-Generated Fake About Selling Soil From Yevhen Konovalets’s Grave | Ukraine news

Defense Ministry to create division to counter disinformation

Disinformation pages target Aussie music royalty with…

Editors Picks

Georgia Chamber to counter ‘misinformation, disinformation’ about data centers

August 25, 2026

Thames Valley PC who created false records committed gross misconduct

August 25, 2026

Margarint warns new disinformation definition risks selective use

August 25, 2026

OpenAI bans Russian ChatGPT accounts in influence campaign

August 25, 2026

"Watch out for Russian meddling in Sweden's elections" – Norran

August 25, 2026

Latest Articles

Daily Mail misleads its readers about electric vehicles 

August 25, 2026

Russian Propagandists Spread AI-Generated Fake About Selling Soil From Yevhen Konovalets’s Grave | Ukraine news

August 25, 2026

AI misinformation is accelerating Africa’s risk landscape

August 25, 2026

Subscribe to News

Get the latest news and updates directly to your inbox.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest TikTok Instagram
Copyright © 2026 Web Stat. All Rights Reserved.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Contact

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.