FTC Cracks Down on Deceptive AI Schemes in "Operation AI Comply"
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has launched "Operation AI Comply," a sweeping law enforcement initiative targeting companies exploiting artificial intelligence (AI) to deceive and defraud consumers. The FTC emphasizes that the burgeoning field of AI is not exempt from existing consumer protection laws. The agency is committed to ensuring a fair marketplace for both legitimate businesses and consumers by actively pursuing companies using AI to promote misleading claims or facilitate fraudulent schemes. These actions underscore the FTC’s commitment to preventing AI from becoming a tool for consumer exploitation. The targeted companies represent a spectrum of deceptive practices, ranging from bogus “robot lawyer” services to elaborate e-commerce scams promising unrealistic profits through AI-powered tools.
One of the most prominent cases involves DoNotPay, a company that advertised its AI chatbot as the "world’s first robot lawyer." The FTC alleges that DoNotPay’s claims of being able to replace human lawyers were deceptive, failing to provide the promised legal expertise. DoNotPay marketed its ability to help consumers “sue for assault without a lawyer” and generate legally sound documents, boasting it would revolutionize the legal industry. However, the FTC found no evidence that DoNotPay conducted adequate testing to validate these claims or that the company employed any qualified legal professionals. A proposed settlement compels DoNotPay to pay $193,000 and notify its subscribers about the limitations of its legal services. The company is also prohibited from making unsubstantiated claims about its ability to replace professional services.
Several cases within Operation AI Comply center around e-commerce schemes that prey on consumers’ desire for passive income. Ascend Ecom, operating under various names, allegedly defrauded consumers of at least $25 million by promising exorbitant earnings through AI-powered online storefronts. The scheme involved charging hefty fees for setting up these storefronts and requiring substantial investments in inventory. Despite assurances of five-figure monthly incomes, the promised profits rarely materialized, leaving consumers with significant financial losses. The FTC alleges that Ascend pressured dissatisfied customers to remove negative reviews and unlawfully threatened to withhold refunds for those who complained publicly. A court order has temporarily halted Ascend’s operations, placing the company under receivership while the FTC’s case proceeds.
Ecommerce Empire Builders (EEB), another targeted company, employed similar tactics, promising consumers they could build "AI-powered Ecommerce Empires" through expensive training programs and “done-for-you” online stores. According to the FTC, EEB’s CEO, Peter Prusinowski, enriched himself at the expense of consumers who invested up to $35,000 in stores that failed to generate significant income. Despite marketing claims of $10,000 monthly earnings, the FTC alleges that EEB lacked evidence to support such projections. Consumers reported negligible profits and encountered resistance when seeking refunds. Like Ascend Ecom, EEB’s operations have been temporarily halted by a court order, and the company is under receivership pending the outcome of the FTC’s case.
Beyond fraudulent services, Operation AI Comply also addresses companies providing tools that facilitate deceptive practices. Rytr, a company offering an AI “writing assistant,” is accused of enabling the creation of fake online reviews. The FTC alleges that Rytr’s service generated detailed, often unrealistic reviews based on minimal user input. These fabricated reviews, containing specific details unrelated to the user’s experience, could mislead consumers relying on them for purchasing decisions. The complaint alleges that some Rytr subscribers generated thousands of potentially fake reviews, potentially harming both consumers and honest competitors. A proposed order would prohibit Rytr from advertising or selling services designed for generating consumer reviews.
Another e-commerce scheme targeted by the FTC, operating as Passive Scaling and later rebranded as FBA Machine, allegedly defrauded consumers of over $15.9 million with false promises of guaranteed income through AI-powered online stores. Bratislav Rozenfeld, also known as Steven Rozenfeld and Steven Rozen, allegedly spearheaded this scheme, promoting unrealistic earnings claims and guaranteeing refunds that never materialized. FBA Machine’s marketing touted "AI-powered" tools and testimonials of clients earning over $100,000 monthly, despite a lack of substantiating evidence. As with the other e-commerce schemes, a court order has halted FBA Machine’s operations and placed the company under receivership while the FTC’s litigation continues.
Operation AI Comply builds upon previous FTC actions against AI-related deceptive practices. These include cases against Automators, an online storefront scheme; Career Step, which allegedly used AI to lure consumers into ineffective career training; NGL Labs, which allegedly marketed an anonymous messaging app with purported AI moderation to children; Rite Aid, for allegedly using AI facial recognition technology without adequate safeguards; and CRI Genetics, for allegedly making deceptive claims about the accuracy of its AI-powered DNA reports. The FTC’s actions demonstrate its proactive stance on regulating AI technologies and ensuring that they are not used to exploit consumers. These cases serve as a warning to companies attempting to leverage the hype surrounding AI for deceptive purposes.