Starmer Condemns Musk’s "Lies and Misinformation," Defends Record Amidst Far-Right Attacks
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer launched a scathing attack on "lies and misinformation" eroding UK democracy, responding to a torrent of criticism from Elon Musk. The Tesla and X owner has taken a volatile interest in British politics since Labour’s July election victory, using his platform to demand a new election and Starmer’s imprisonment. His latest provocation, a poll asking his 210 million followers if America should "liberate" Britain from its "tyrannical government," has further escalated tensions. Starmer, speaking near London, refrained from directly naming Musk but targeted those "spreading lies and misinformation," particularly Conservative politicians echoing Musk’s claims.
Musk’s interventions have ranged from accusations of "two-tier policing," favouring pro-Palestinian and Black Lives Matter demonstrators over far-right groups, to demands for a public inquiry into historical child sexual abuse cases in northern England. These cases, involving predominantly Pakistani men, have been exploited by the far-right to link immigration with child abuse and accuse politicians of a cover-up. Musk’s call for an inquiry overlooks the fact that one already occurred under the previous Conservative government, although recommendations remain largely unimplemented. He has also personally attacked Starmer, accusing him of failing to prosecute offenders during his tenure as Director of Public Prosecutions, a claim Starmer vehemently denies, citing his efforts to reopen closed cases and overhaul prosecution strategies.
The escalating rhetoric reached a fever pitch with Musk’s attack on Jess Phillips, Minister for Combating Violence Against Women and Girls, branding her a "rape genocide apologist" deserving of imprisonment. Starmer condemned this as a dangerous crossing of the line, emphasizing that while robust political debate is essential, it must be grounded in truth, not lies. Musk’s support for the far-right activist known as Tommy Robinson, currently imprisoned for contempt of court, further fuels concerns about the billionaire’s influence on extremist narratives. Starmer criticized those “cheerleading” Robinson, linking them to the promotion of street violence.
Starmer’s cautious approach, avoiding directly naming Musk, likely stems from a desire to avoid amplifying his voice or antagonizing Musk’s ally, former US President Donald Trump. This strategy mirrors that of German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, who has also been targeted by Musk’s online ire. Scholz expressed concern over Musk’s endorsement of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) party during the German elections, highlighting the worrying trend of foreign interference in democratic processes. Starmer’s focus remains on the actions of British politicians, particularly Conservatives he accuses of amplifying far-right rhetoric in a desperate bid for attention.
The central concern, Starmer argues, is not Musk’s pronouncements themselves, but the willingness of British politicians to legitimize and amplify them. He warned that abandoning the principle of truth in political discourse sets a dangerous precedent, placing democracy on a “slippery slope.” While some Conservatives, including party leader Kemi Badenoch, have echoed Musk’s criticisms, the main beneficiary appears to be Reform UK, the hard-right party led by Nigel Farage. Musk’s floated multimillion-dollar donation to Reform UK, reported by Farage last month, further complicates the political landscape.
However, this burgeoning alliance has taken an unexpected turn. Musk’s recent post declaring that Reform UK needs new leadership and that Farage “doesn’t have what it takes” has created a rift. Farage publicly disagreed with Musk’s assessment, highlighting the unpredictable nature of Musk’s political interventions and the complexities of the relationships he cultivates. The episode underscores the volatile and unpredictable nature of this new political dynamic, leaving observers questioning the long-term impact of Musk’s erratic engagement on British politics and the integrity of its democratic processes.
