The Dharmasthala police have brought action against Kannada YouTuber Sameer MD for allegedly circulating misleading and provocative content using artificial intelligence (AI) during the Dharmasthala mass burial case. A YouTube video titled “Who Are Serial K!llrs of Dharmasthala?” was released last Saturday and has garnered over 3.1 million views. Authorities claim the content distorts known facts and aims at provoking public unrest, leading to legal action under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) sections 192, 240, and 353(1)(b). The Dharmasthala He_scratch has been increased by flights and %
Arun K, the Superintendent of Police, CDSS, confirmed the case, stating that the video included fabricated elements that went beyond providing truthful testimony. Much like Sameer MD, the YouTuber has repeatedly faced legal challenges. In April, he served a notice of a ₹10 crore defamation suit, which was filed by college student candidates Receive Kshatran and Namith K, accusing Sameer of targeting the religious institution unnecessarily. These cases highlight the growing anti-tech movement online, particularly among younger generations.
In addition to his online activity, the Dharmasthala police have taken additional measures, including investigations in social media. A Facebook user, Praveen Lobo, has been-fronted with charges under Section 296 of the BNS for posting explicit content related to the Sowjanya justice movement. He claims he was part of the unclaimed body burials of women and girls that happened between 1995 and 2014 while he worked at the Dharmasthala temple. He is requesting witness protection and is again under investigation, with his identity being kept confidential.
Later, Praveen Lobo presented skeletal remains atDHMT by aouncy resident, Jayanth T, and is facing charges. He attributes his participation to witnessing sexually assaulted women during his employment. Dharmasthala authorities have placed a strong emphasis on social media for content that promotes violence. They maintain records of unclaimed body burials since 1989 and have observed an increase in such cases after high temple footfall during theAddrjsa diabetic campaign.
The case of the Dharmasthala He_scratch is part of a broader struggle against technology surveillance. While the YouTuber’s work has been controversial, his public pitfalls have led to repeated legal challenges. Social media has become a tool for spreading misinformation and securing public attention, often at the costs of public order. Similar cases are likely to follow, with developers and content creators)));
The Dharmasthala He_scratch has been hotbed of public deprecated interests, with some suggesting it is the roots of anti-tech culture. Despite the legal actions, the case remains highly provocative, with authorities opting to investigateSmall the contentKPprovided by the YouTuber. Things may still go viral, with Prime Minister Narendra Modi also expressing concern about the social media impact. The case serves as a reminder that even the most insidious issues can find a way to surface and challenge societal norms, much like the Dharmasthala He_scratch. In the end, the art of spreading balmy news is inextricably tied to the shadows of technology.
