Steven Bartlett’s ‘Diary of a CEO’ Podcast Under Scrutiny for Amplifying Harmful Health Misinformation
A BBC investigation has revealed that "The Diary of a CEO" podcast, hosted by Dragons’ Den star Steven Bartlett, is disseminating potentially harmful health misinformation. The podcast, which has seen a surge in popularity since shifting its focus to health and wellness, features guests making unsubstantiated claims about medical treatments with minimal challenge from Bartlett. These claims, ranging from cancer treatments using the keto diet to anti-vaccine conspiracies, reach millions of listeners across various platforms, raising concerns among medical experts about the potential dangers of spreading such misinformation.
The BBC investigation analyzed 15 health-related episodes of the podcast, identifying an average of 14 harmful claims per episode. These claims contradict established scientific evidence and, if followed, could lead to adverse health outcomes. Experts consulted by the BBC expressed alarm over the podcast’s lack of critical scrutiny, warning that it fuels distrust in conventional medicine. This concern is amplified by the podcast’s significant reach, with episodes also published on Bartlett’s YouTube channel, which boasts over seven million subscribers. The channel’s monthly views have skyrocketed from nine million to 15 million since the podcast shifted its focus.
One notable example cited by the BBC involved an episode featuring Dr. Aseem Malhotra, a doctor known for spreading misinformation about Covid-19 vaccines. Dr. Malhotra claimed that the "Covid vaccine was a net negative for society," a statement directly contradicting the World Health Organization’s assessment that the vaccines saved numerous lives. Bartlett defended the inclusion of such views, arguing for presenting "both sides" and invoking historical figures like Gandhi and Martin Luther King to justify platforming controversial opinions. However, critics argue this approach provides a veneer of legitimacy to unsubstantiated claims and normalizes misinformation.
The podcast frequently features guests who promote alternative health solutions while disparaging conventional treatments. Dr. Thomas Seyfried, a proponent of using the ketogenic diet to treat cancer, downplayed the effectiveness of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, comparing them to "medieval cures." Experts stressed the dangers of such advice, emphasizing that restricting diets during cancer treatment can severely jeopardize a patient’s health. These guests often advertise their products on the podcast, raising questions about potential conflicts of interest.
Experts worry that the simplicity and perceived lack of side effects associated with these alternative health solutions make them appealing to listeners, potentially leading them to abandon evidence-based medicine. This shift away from proven treatments can have dire consequences, particularly for those managing serious health conditions. The algorithmic nature of online platforms further exacerbates the problem, with health-related clickbait and sensationalized titles often amplified, reaching even wider audiences.
Concerns extend beyond the content of the podcast itself. Bartlett’s financial investments in health and wellness companies, including a meal replacement company and a personalized nutrition program, raise questions about potential biases influencing his choice of guests and topics. The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) recently banned two Facebook adverts featuring Bartlett for promoting products from these companies without disclosing his investments. This incident highlights the blurred lines between content creation and marketing, raising ethical concerns about transparency and potential conflicts of interest.
Responding to the BBC investigation, Flight Studio, Bartlett’s production company, defended the podcast’s format as an open forum for a diverse range of voices. They emphasized that the reviewed episodes represent a small fraction of the total content produced and reiterated the podcast’s commitment to fostering open dialogue. However, critics argue that this defense fails to address the core issue of amplifying potentially harmful misinformation under the guise of open discussion. The lack of rigorous fact-checking and critical analysis leaves listeners vulnerable to misleading claims that could have serious health implications.
The BBC’s investigation raises crucial questions about the responsibility of podcasters and online platforms in curating and disseminating information, particularly in the sensitive realm of health and wellness. The growing popularity of podcasts necessitates a greater emphasis on accuracy and responsible reporting to prevent the spread of potentially harmful misinformation. While freedom of expression is paramount, it should not come at the expense of public health and safety. The case of "The Diary of a CEO" serves as a cautionary tale, highlighting the potential dangers of unchecked narratives and the urgent need for greater accountability in the rapidly expanding world of online content.
