Trump Administration Fuels Attacks on Mainline Christian Denominations
The opening weeks of the reinstated Trump administration have been marked by a series of escalating attacks on mainline Christian denominations, including Episcopalians, Catholics, and Lutherans. These attacks, often spearheaded by prominent Trump allies like Michael Flynn and amplified by Elon Musk, target these denominations’ charitable work with marginalized groups, particularly immigrants and refugees. The rhetoric employed frequently questions the Christian identity of these churches, framing their humanitarian efforts as financially motivated or even illegal.
The initial wave of attacks focused on Episcopal Bishop Mariann Budde following her inaugural prayer, in which she called for mercy on LGBTQ children and migrant workers. Subsequently, Vice President J.D. Vance targeted the Catholic Church, accusing them of prioritizing financial gain over genuine care for immigrants and refugees. Most recently, the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) became a target, with Flynn accusing them of misusing taxpayer funds and questioning their religious authenticity.
Flynn’s attack on the ELCA, shared on X (formerly Twitter), centered on grants received by Lutheran organizations from the Department of Health and Human Services. These grants support a wide range of services, including foster care, adoption, food pantries, elder care, and resources for domestic abuse victims. Flynn’s post, which included scare quotes around the word "Lutheran," implied that the church’s charitable work is a guise for financial impropriety. This attack follows a similar pattern of accusations against the Catholic Church, and echoes previous criticism directed at the ELCA following Minnesota Governor Tim Walz’s selection as Kamala Harris’s running mate.
Elon Musk, a key figure in the Trump administration, amplified Flynn’s allegations and claimed that his "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) was taking action to halt these supposedly illegal payments. DOGE, established by a Trump executive order, operates outside congressional oversight and has raised concerns regarding its access to sensitive government data. Its recent actions include the removal of top security officials who resisted granting Musk access to restricted areas within the U.S. Agency for International Development.
These attacks on mainline denominations are part of a broader trend within the Trump administration, which has shown increasing hostility towards religious groups perceived as insufficiently aligned with its Christian Nationalist agenda. Flynn, a central figure in the ReAwaken America Tour (RAT), has consistently promoted a vision of a singular, nationally enforced religion, blurring the lines between religious belief and political ideology.
The ELCA has responded swiftly to these allegations. Global Refuge, formerly known as Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, issued a statement condemning the accusations and defending their longstanding humanitarian efforts, which have spanned across both Democratic and Republican administrations. ELCA Presiding Bishop Elizabeth Eaton released a video message denouncing the "misinformation and baseless doubt" surrounding their work and reaffirming the church’s commitment to serving those in need.
The attacks on Episcopalians, Catholics, and Lutherans underscore the increasingly fraught relationship between the Trump administration and religious groups that prioritize social justice and humanitarian aid. Critics argue that these attacks represent a threat to religious freedom and an attempt to impose a narrow, exclusionary definition of Christianity onto the nation. The rapid succession of these attacks within the first two weeks of the new administration has raised serious concerns about the future of religious pluralism in the United States.
The ELCA and other targeted denominations, however, are demonstrating resilience in the face of these challenges. Their leaders have forcefully defended their work and reaffirmed their commitment to their faith’s core values. The broader response to these attacks remains to be seen, but the situation highlights the potential for conflict between a government embracing Christian Nationalism and religious communities committed to inclusivity and social justice. The actions of figures like Flynn and Musk, and the Trump administration’s embrace of their rhetoric, raise critical questions about the future of religious freedom and the very definition of Christianity in the United States. Experts in authoritarianism, like Ruth Ben-Ghiat, have expressed alarm about Musk’s increasing influence within the government and his alignment with figures like Flynn. These developments suggest a potential shift towards a more authoritarian and less pluralistic approach to governance. The emerging conflict between the Trump administration and mainline Christian denominations underscores a broader struggle over the role of religion in public life and the very nature of American democracy.
