Medical Negligence, Not Pro-Life Laws, Blamed for Maternal Deaths Post-Roe
A recent analysis challenges the narrative that pro-life laws are the primary cause of increased maternal mortality since the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Leah Sargeant, a senior policy analyst at the Niskanen Center, argues that medical negligence and inadequate healthcare are the true culprits behind many tragic deaths of pregnant women. Sargeant contends that the media has often misrepresented the circumstances surrounding these deaths, wrongly attributing them to abortion restrictions. She emphasizes that no state bans treatment for ectopic pregnancies or complications arising from abortions, highlighting the need to hold medical professionals accountable for substandard care rather than scapegoating pro-life legislation.
Sargeant points to the tragic case of Yenifer ‘Yeni’ Alvarez-Estrada Glick, a Texas resident who died during a high-risk pregnancy. Glick, uninsured and suffering from diabetes, hypertension, and a history of pulmonary edema, wanted to carry her pregnancy to term. Sargeant asserts that proactive medical intervention, such as earlier delivery or prompt paramedic response, could have saved both Glick and her baby. She criticizes the narrative that abortion is the only solution for low-income or marginalized pregnant women, arguing that such a perspective perpetuates systemic inequalities rather than addressing them.
Sargeant’s analysis extends beyond Glick’s case, examining several other instances where media reports have blamed pro-life laws for maternal deaths. She meticulously dissects these cases, demonstrating how medical errors, misinformation, and delayed care were the primary factors. Sargeant warns that such biased reporting not only misrepresents the reality of maternal healthcare but also endangers women by creating a false perception that necessary medical care is unavailable. This misinformation, she argues, provides cover for negligent doctors, allowing them to blame legal restrictions rather than their own inadequate practices.
The misinformation surrounding the legality of miscarriage and abortion complication treatment has far-reaching consequences. Sargeant cites the case of Candi Miller, a Georgia resident who died at home after self-managing a chemical abortion and subsequently taking a lethal combination of painkillers and fentanyl. Miller’s family stated she avoided seeking medical help due to fear of prosecution, a fear fueled by misinformation about the legal landscape. Sargeant stresses that this type of misinformation not only jeopardizes women’s lives directly but also creates a chilling effect, deterring women from seeking necessary medical care.
Sargeant argues against the notion that abortion is a necessary safety net for poor and marginalized pregnant women. She criticizes the idea that abortion should be the solution for inadequate healthcare systems, calling it a further violation of their rights rather than a solution. She advocates for comprehensive healthcare that addresses the unique challenges of pregnancy and provides ongoing support for both mothers and children.
Instead of focusing on abortion access as a solution to systemic healthcare failures, Sargeant calls for a "medical reckoning." She emphasizes the need for higher standards of care, improved access to information, and accountability for medical professionals who provide substandard care. She argues that true justice for women and children lies in ensuring access to quality healthcare throughout their lives, not in relying on abortion as a stopgap measure for systemic inequalities. Sargeant’s analysis provides a crucial counterpoint to the prevailing narrative surrounding maternal mortality, urging a shift in focus from abortion restrictions to the underlying issues of medical negligence and healthcare disparities. Her work highlights the urgent need for informed discussions and policy changes that prioritize the well-being of both mothers and their children.
