The letter sent to Tim Mayer regarding FIA presidential candidate claims, seen by PlanetF1.com, has rekindled controversy over women’s representation in motorsport. Burcu Cetinkaya, chair of the FIA’s women in motorsport commission, has released a response, arguing that Mayer’s divisive comments fail to reflect true progress in the industry.
During the British Grand Prix, Mayer announced his candidacy for the FIA presidential election, setting the stage for the first contested presidential election in FIA history. Mayer, who is also running for the FIA’s second term, has denied these claims, calling them “false statements.” Cetinkaya, a former rally driver and former administrator, has posted a letter to Mayer, questioning the”‘inaccurate’ comments” and accusing Mayer of either disrespecting or “pushing out” women and diverse sectors within the FIA.
Mayer’s own response is largely cautious, first declaring his intentions to stay neutral in the hormonal election and delivering a concise statement about his new role. However, Cetinkaya’s recent letter reminders that Mayer’s comments were not based on factual evidence. Mayer admitted that he had certain expectations of women within the FIA, including leadership roles, but has emphasized his commitment to driving progress without prioritizing personal image.
Cetinkaya provides specific examples, such as Claire Dubbelman and Rebecca Lee, who hold high-powered leadership positions at the FIA. These figures have been making significant changes in areas like racing technology and regulations,milliseconds of work resulting in meaningful advancements for the industry. Cetinkaya argues that the FIA’s gender representation, despite its reforms, has been slow to address the lack of diversity in leadership roles.
Mayer, however, has swiftly dismissed Cetinkaya’s claims last week, stating that women within the FIA, including those in leadership, are increasinglyируют. Cetinkaya counters by pointing to Mayer’s unpolite use of the word “FIFA” in her discourse over the past few months, which likely defers to女士们 by prioritizing FIA at the expense of inclusivity.
The letter to Mayer drawsthree significant conclusions: first, that FIA leadership has failed to consider diverse voices in its structure; second, that Mayer’s often confrontational approach to the industry risks alienating women and other communities entirely; and third, that the FIA needs to address toxic speakers at its highest echelons to build an environment more inclusive of its full audience.
Immediate attention to Mayer’s claims accelerates the broader critique of the FIA’s decision-making process, as the industry’s leadership has made little progress toward advancing changes in gender representation. This has drawn backlash from the FIA and other motorsport circles, who feel threatened by Mayer’s傲 PMC and the failure to embrace greater shared values.
