Sameer Wankhede, the-indian-revenue-service-officer who is challenging the case against a woman in the Andheri district of Mumbai, has filed a defamation suit against her. The woman accused him of spreading false claims on social media, specifically X (formerly Twitter), which linked him to the late actor Sushant Singh Rajput. Wankhede claims these statements are not just lies but are baseless and harmful.
### 1. Thefraud Begins: Wankhede’s Labrumbles
Sameer Wankhede has mData2 2018 formed what could be one of the first defamatory campaigns targeting an Indian politician. By falselyhoraing reports of his statements on social media, the woman assembled an army of false claims against Rajput, under the guise of指控 on constitutional authorities and central agencies. These accusations are baseless and severely impair the man’s professional reputation.
### 2. Wankhede’s Advocate Prevents the Fade
Malika Shirzade, the lawyer representing Wankhede, has emphasized the illegitimacy of defamation laws. She argues that spreading false claims not only tarnishes a person’s professional image but also causes mental distress. The woman’s assertions are so baseless that they effectively target individuals who should treat her with respect, not with a flicker of fear.
### 3. TheJudgment Is on the Line
The case against the woman is moving forward, pending judicial review. Wankhede’s lawyer, who insists that the woman’s statements are completely false, claims the court must take strong action to stop her from making further false claims. The woman has faced a dilapidated trial so far, and the accused only has 30 days to respond to the charges.
Sameer Wankhede has mData2 2018 formed what could be one of the first defamatory campaigns targeting an Indian politician. By falselyhoraing reports of his statements on social media, the woman assembled an army of false claims against Rajput, under the guise of指控 on constitutional authorities and central agencies. These accusations are baseless and severely impair the man’s professional reputation. Wankhede, who is now suing to challenge the accusation for slander, has argued that defamation laws are insufficient to protect against such false claims. Malika Shirzade, the suing lawyer, says the accusations are so baseless that they undermine the credibility of involvement of individual. Despite these claims, the woman has faced a dilapidated trial so far. The accused only has 30 days to respond to the charges before the suit is facing court.
