Ukraine Rejects UN Report on Religious Law, Citing Misrepresentation and Russian Aggression
Kyiv, Ukraine – The Ukrainian Ministry of Foreign Affairs has vehemently rejected conclusions presented in the 41st periodic report by the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), released on December 31, 2024. The report’s assessment of amendments to Ukraine’s Law "On the protection of the constitutional order in the sphere of activities of religious organizations" has drawn sharp criticism from Kyiv, with the ministry labeling it a distortion of reality. At the heart of the dispute lies the Ukrainian government’s effort to safeguard its national security against what it perceives as Russia’s weaponization of religion amidst ongoing conflict.
The Ukrainian government’s primary contention is that the UN report misrepresents the nature and intent of the amended law. Contrary to the report’s implications, the ministry insists the law does not impose a blanket ban on any existing churches within Ukraine. Instead, the legislation aims to sever the ties between religious organizations operating within Ukraine and their governing centers located in Russia or Russian-occupied territories, particularly those entities that actively support or endorse Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. This targeted approach, according to the ministry, is essential to protect Ukrainian sovereignty and national security against foreign influence exerted through religious channels.
The ministry underscored the context of Russia’s ongoing aggression against Ukraine, accusing Moscow of systematically exploiting religion as a tool to further its political and military objectives. This alleged manipulation of religious sentiment, according to Kyiv, necessitates robust measures to counter the detrimental influence wielded by religious organizations aligned with the Russian state. The ministry argues that these organizations, often deeply intertwined with the Russian government, pose a direct threat to Ukrainian statehood, cultural identity, and national unity. Therefore, the amended law is portrayed as a necessary defense mechanism against this perceived threat.
Ukraine’s Foreign Ministry further accused Russia of perpetrating numerous violations of religious freedom throughout the conflict. The ministry cited instances of deliberate killings of religious figures and believers, widespread destruction of religious buildings and sacred sites, and systematic persecution of religious communities that do not align with the Russian Orthodox Church in occupied territories. These actions, according to Kyiv, underscore the hypocrisy of Russia’s stance on religious freedom and demonstrate the urgent need for Ukraine to protect its own religious landscape from external interference and aggression.
The Ukrainian government also called on the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission to maintain objectivity in its assessments of the religious freedom situation within the country. The ministry emphasized the importance of accurately documenting and reporting on Russia’s alleged crimes against Ukrainian believers, religious communities, their leaders, and church properties. This appeal for impartiality reflects Ukraine’s desire for the international community to recognize the complex realities of the conflict and the genuine threats to religious freedom posed by Russia’s actions.
In concluding its response, the ministry reiterated its commitment to protecting the religious freedoms of its citizens while simultaneously safeguarding national security against external threats. The government maintains that the amended law is a necessary and proportionate measure designed to address the specific challenges posed by Russia’s alleged manipulation of religion in the context of ongoing conflict. The ministry’s strong rebuttal of the UN report highlights the deep divisions and competing narratives surrounding the issue of religious freedom in wartime Ukraine, emphasizing the urgent need for continued international scrutiny and dialogue.
