Virginia-Based Contractor Settles for $2.6 Million in Small Business Fraud Case
Newport News, VA – R&K Enterprises Inc. (R&K), a government contractor based in Newport News, Virginia, has agreed to pay a substantial settlement of $2.6 million to resolve allegations of fraudulent misrepresentation regarding its eligibility for small business set-aside contracts. The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia announced the settlement on January 7th, concluding a multi-agency investigation into R&K’s business practices. The investigation revealed a complex scheme involving the manipulation of revenue figures and the creation of a seemingly separate entity to circumvent size restrictions imposed on small business program participants.
The core of the allegations centers on R&K’s alleged misrepresentation of its size and revenue to qualify for contracts specifically reserved for small businesses. These programs aim to level the playing field in government contracting, providing smaller companies with opportunities to compete against larger corporations. Eligibility for these programs is typically determined by a company’s average revenue over a specific period, in this case, the previous three years. The government contends that R&K knowingly falsified its revenue figures to appear smaller than it actually was, thereby gaining an unfair advantage in bidding for these set-aside contracts.
To maintain the facade of eligibility, R&K allegedly employed a sophisticated strategy involving another company, K&P Management Inc. (K&P). R&K claimed that K&P was an independent entity and, therefore, its revenue should not be considered when calculating R&K’s size for small business program eligibility. However, the investigation revealed a close and intertwined relationship between the two companies, effectively negating R&K’s claims of independence. K&P was owned by the wife of R&K’s owner, creating a clear conflict of interest and raising red flags about the true nature of their relationship.
Further deepening the suspicion of impropriety were the financial flows between the two entities. All of K&P’s revenue, according to the U.S. attorney’s office, originated from R&K, indicating a significant level of financial dependence that contradicted the claim of separate operations. The two companies also shared executive personnel, further blurring the lines of their purported independence. Adding to this, the investigation found evidence suggesting that R&K exercised a level of control over K&P’s operations, solidifying the argument that the two companies were, in effect, operating as one.
Had R&K accurately reported its size, including K&P’s revenue as required under the program rules, it would have exceeded the size limitations and been ineligible for the small business set-aside contracts it secured. This deliberate misrepresentation allowed R&K to improperly compete with legitimate small businesses, denying them fair access to government contracts and undermining the very purpose of these programs. The $2.6 million settlement represents a significant step towards holding R&K accountable for its alleged actions and recouping funds meant to support bona fide small businesses.
The U.S. Attorney, Jessica D. Aber, emphasized the commitment of her office to safeguarding the integrity of these programs, stating that this investigation highlights the importance of interagency cooperation in uncovering and addressing such fraudulent activities. While this settlement resolves the allegations against R&K, it’s crucial to note that it does not constitute an admission of guilt. The company has agreed to pay the settlement amount without admitting liability. This settlement serves as a stark reminder to government contractors of the importance of adhering to program rules and regulations and underscores the government’s commitment to pursuing those who attempt to exploit programs designed to support small businesses.
