Prince Andrew Faces New Police Complaint Over Alleged Use of False Name in Company Records
Prince Andrew, the Duke of York, finds himself embroiled in yet another controversy as anti-monarchy group Republic has filed a police complaint against him. The complaint alleges that the prince used the false name "Andrew Inverness" in official company documents filed with Companies House, the UK’s registrar of companies. This latest accusation adds to the growing list of scandals that have plagued the Duke in recent years, including his association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein and more recently, alleged connections to a Chinese spy. Republic argues that using false information when registering with Companies House constitutes a criminal offense, and as a public figure and member of the monarchy, Prince Andrew should be held to a higher standard.
The Metropolitan Police have confirmed receipt of the report and stated that it will be assessed to determine if further action is required. While the police have not launched a formal investigation at this stage, the complaint adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing scrutiny surrounding Prince Andrew’s activities. This development casts a further shadow over the royal family, who have been striving to distance themselves from the Duke’s controversies. The complaint also raises questions about the extent of Prince Andrew’s business dealings and the reasons behind the alleged use of a pseudonym.
The allegations regarding the use of the name "Andrew Inverness" first surfaced in 2019 when reports emerged that Prince Andrew used this name to establish a company called Naples Gold in 2002. This contrasts with the practices of other members of the royal family, such as Prince William and Princess Kate, and Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, who have used their official titles in Companies House filings. While there is no official confirmation that "Andrew Inverness" refers to the Duke of York, the use of a similar name, "HRH Andrew Inverness," in connection with another company, Urramoor Ltd, along with a matching date of birth, raises significant questions.
The situation is further complicated by Urramoor Ltd’s application to be struck off the company register. This move, coupled with the police complaint, raises concerns about the nature of Prince Andrew’s financial activities and the potential implications for the royal family. Republic’s chief executive, Graham Smith, emphasizes that the alleged use of a false name warrants investigation, especially given Prince Andrew’s prominent position. He criticizes the perceived tendency to overlook potential legal breaches by members of the royal family.
The Metropolitan Police’s assessment of the complaint will be a crucial next step in determining the course of this latest controversy. While they have not committed to a formal investigation, the police will likely inform Republic of their decision. If the police decide to proceed with an investigation, it could prolong the negative publicity surrounding Prince Andrew and further damage the reputation of the monarchy. Even if the police choose not to investigate, the allegations themselves continue to erode public trust in the Duke of York.
This latest scandal surrounding Prince Andrew presents a significant challenge for the royal family, particularly for King Charles III, who has been attempting to modernize the monarchy and distance it from controversy. The continued emergence of negative stories about Prince Andrew threatens to undermine these efforts and perpetuate a sense of crisis within the institution. As the police assess the complaint, the royal family braces for the potential fallout and the ongoing scrutiny of Prince Andrew’s actions. The Duke of York’s future role within the monarchy, and the long-term impact on the institution itself, remain uncertain amidst these continuing controversies.
