Accused Denies Government Narrative in Gambian Double Murder Trial
BANJUL, The Gambia – Ousainou Bojang, the primary suspect in the murder of two police officers and the severe wounding of another, vehemently refuted government-circulated information during his testimony at the Banjul High Court. Presiding over the case, Justice Ebrima Jaiteh heard Bojang categorically deny claims made by government spokesperson Ebrima Sankareh and an individual named Abubacarr Sulayman Jeng. These claims, according to Bojang, falsely linked him to the Brikama Area Council as an employee and painted him as a rebel fighter from the Cassamance region.
Bojang’s testimony centered on the alleged dissemination of false information through various news outlets. He specifically addressed Sankareh’s statement, which he claimed misrepresented him as a Cassamance rebel. Furthermore, he accused Jeng of fabricating a narrative that depicted him as a long-standing rebel combatant who brought a weapon from Cassamance. These accusations, Bojang insisted, were entirely baseless and intended to tarnish his reputation. He asserted that he had no connection to either Sankareh or Jeng.
Defense lawyer Lamin S. Darboe presented Bojang with copies of several newspapers, including the Standard Newspaper, Point Newspaper, and Foroyaa Newspaper, all published in September 2023. These publications, according to Darboe, contained the allegedly false statements made by Sankareh and Jeng. Bojang confirmed recognizing the articles and their content. The newspapers were subsequently admitted as evidence in the case, marked as exhibits with the consent of Justice Jaiteh and without objection from the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), AM Yusuf, or the defense lawyer for the second accused, Amie Bojang, represented by A Sillah.
In a dramatic plea, Bojang called upon the authorities at Mile II Central Prison to release a video purportedly showing the actual shooter of the police officers. He argued that this video evidence would exonerate him and reveal the true perpetrator of the crime. Bojang expressed his belief that the prison authorities were withholding crucial evidence that would establish his innocence. He also recounted harsh treatment he endured at the prison, alleging he was confined to a small, windowless cell, an experience he interpreted as an attempt to suffocate him.
Continuing his testimony, Bojang revealed further details about his detention, including the confiscation of his cell phones by prison officials. He claimed one Lamin Cham seized his smaller phone, while Ebou Sowe took his smartphone. Darboe, his defense counsel, requested the prosecution to produce these confiscated items in court, arguing their relevance to the defense’s case. DPP Yusuf questioned the significance of the phones to the proceedings but ultimately agreed to provide them to Darboe at the next adjourned date.
Adding another layer to the complex proceedings, Darboe brought to the court’s attention a previously issued order requiring the Station Officer of Sukuta Police Station to produce the station’s diary from January to December 2023. This order, Darboe pointed out, had not been complied with. Justice Jaiteh reiterated the court’s directive, emphasizing the importance of adherence to legal procedures, and ordered the Sukuta Police Station Officer to appear in court on the next adjourned date. The ongoing trial continues to unfold with the defense challenging the prosecution’s narrative and seeking to establish Bojang’s innocence in the face of serious allegations. The release of the requested video and the production of the station diary are now key elements expected to shed more light on the events surrounding the tragic deaths of the police officers.
The implications of this case extend beyond the courtroom, raising questions about the dissemination of information, the role of government officials in shaping public perception, and the rights of the accused within the Gambian justice system. Bojang’s emotional testimony and his insistence on the existence of exculpatory evidence have captured public attention, turning the trial into a closely watched affair. The upcoming proceedings are anticipated to provide further insights into the complex circumstances surrounding the alleged crimes and offer the accused an opportunity to present his defense fully. The court’s insistence on the production of the requested materials underscores the importance of due process and transparency in the pursuit of justice. As the trial progresses, the Gambian public awaits the emergence of a clearer picture surrounding these tragic events and the eventual determination of Ousainou Bojang’s guilt or innocence.
The case highlights the importance of accurate reporting and the potential consequences of misinformation, particularly in cases involving serious criminal allegations. The defense’s focus on challenging the government’s narrative emphasizes the need for thorough investigation and the careful examination of evidence presented in court. Furthermore, Bojang’s allegations regarding his treatment in custody raise concerns about prison conditions and the rights of detainees, underscoring the need for oversight and accountability within the Gambian correctional system.
The adjourned hearing will be a pivotal point in the proceedings, as the presentation of the requested video and the Sukuta Police Station diary could significantly impact the direction of the case. The court’s insistence on compliance with its orders reflects a commitment to ensuring a fair and transparent trial, allowing both the prosecution and the defense to present their arguments and evidence effectively. The outcome of this case will undoubtedly have significant implications for the individuals involved and for the broader Gambian community, emphasizing the vital role of the judiciary in upholding justice and protecting the rights of all citizens.
