Manchester United’s Strikerless Struggle: Amorim’s Gamble Backfires Against Crystal Palace
Manchester United’s woes continued on Sunday as they fell to a 2-0 defeat at home to Crystal Palace, raising further questions about manager Ruben Amorim’s tactical decisions and the team’s overall attacking impotence. The most glaring issue was Amorim’s decision to start the match without a recognized striker, opting instead to deploy midfielder Kobbie Mainoo in an advanced role. While Mainoo showed glimpses of promise early on, linking up with Alejandro Garnacho and Amad Diallo, the experiment ultimately failed to produce tangible results. United dominated possession and had more shots than Palace, but their lack of a focal point in attack was evident.
Amorim’s pre-match justification for his strikerless setup centered on tactical flexibility and exploiting space in the final third. He emphasized the need for improved possession and build-up play, suggesting that Mainoo’s mobility and link-up ability would unlock Palace’s defense. However, this approach overlooked a fundamental issue plaguing United this season: a lack of players capable of consistently creating and converting scoring opportunities. While Mainoo demonstrated some clever movement and combination play, he lacked the clinical finishing instinct of a natural striker.
Palace, on the other hand, showcased the effectiveness of a more traditional approach, with their striker Jean-Philippe Mateta causing problems for United’s defense throughout the match. Mateta’s physical presence and ability to capitalize on loose balls and half-chances highlighted United’s deficiencies in both boxes. His two goals, one a poacher’s effort from a rebound and the other a powerful counter-attacking finish, underscored the importance of having a reliable goalscorer in the Premier League. Mateta’s performance served as a stark reminder of what United were missing.
Amorim’s decision to leave big-money signings Rasmus Hojlund and Joshua Zirkzee on the bench until the final 20 minutes further fueled criticism. While he defended his choice, citing the need for specific player characteristics, the lack of impact from either substitute only amplified the sense of frustration surrounding United’s attacking woes. Zirkzee was deployed in a deeper role and struggled to make an impact, while Hojlund had limited opportunities to showcase his abilities. Their late introductions, after Palace had already taken the lead, seemed more like an admission of defeat than a tactical masterstroke.
The defeat against Palace exposed deeper issues within United’s squad. Their struggles to create width and deliver effective crosses from wide areas have hampered their attacking threat all season. The continued selection of Mazraoui and Dalot as wing-backs, despite their limitations in providing consistent attacking output, has been a recurring concern for fans and pundits alike. While the recent signing of Patrick Dorgu offers hope for improvement in this area, the team’s overall attacking structure remains a work in progress.
Beyond the tactical shortcomings, the loss of Lisandro Martinez to a potentially serious knee injury adds to Amorim’s growing list of concerns. With their defensive options already stretched, Martinez’s absence could further destabilize the team. The injury adds another layer of complexity to United’s already challenging situation.
The loss to Palace leaves United with seven home defeats in the Premier League this season, a damning statistic that underscores the magnitude of the task facing Amorim. His persistence with the 3-4-3 formation has come under scrutiny, but the more pressing issue is the lack of goalscoring threat within the squad. While tactical tweaks and personnel changes can help improve the team’s performance, the fundamental need for a reliable source of goals remains paramount. Unless United can address this issue, their struggles are likely to continue. The team’s inability to convert possession and chances into goals is a recurring theme that needs urgent attention.
