This summary of Madhabi Puri Buch’s comments on the Jane Street case involving the Indian Securities and Exchange Board of India ( SEBI ) captures the essence of her criticism of the regulatory stance and the court’s oversight of the case. Puri Buch, who is an influential figure in Indian finance, made clear that the SEBI, after regarding the matter for over a year, is now taking decisive action against the US-based firm. Her remarks highlight the growing tension between the Indian regulator and foreign institutions, particularly Jane Street, which has Embassies elsewhere in India and the global marketSetting, and the insinuation that Jane Street’s involvement in Indian and global financial markets is undemocratic. Puri Buch also criticized the media’s failure to provide accurate info and spread misleading narratives of the issue.
The SEBI’s action against Jane Street was a bold move, as the regulator had initially sought to clamp down on the juggernaut. The firm was barred from participating in any financial market activity, including bond and equity trading, and the Indian Investment任销售 Promotion Board ( IIIB ), where the firm managed a significant portion of its assets. The firm has also relied on judges in the securities appeal court, which advises SEBI in handling the case. Puri Buch emphasized that the SEBI’s actions speak for itself, having initiated several internal investigations and being proactive in ensuring accountability.
The court has started imposing penalties on Jane Street and its management teams based on internal oversight, including investigating the firm’s complex strategy and market manipulation tactics. The firm has denied FDA allegations, stating that the case revolves around the organization’s structure rather than illegal activities. Additionally, the board criticized the firm for its exclusive每個偉支配 all trading activities and its attempts to profit on complicity.
After Jane Street’s case was brought to light, SEBI’s reaction further accelerated. The regulator issued several policy-level interventions, including escalating legal action and requesting a cease and desist notice from theimited firm to the brokerage entity’s board. Also, SEBI supported eqlbl requests for the Indian Stock Exchange to grant a-match order to the firm. These actions, alongside the buyout of India’s largest listing on the IB, have triggered calls for a broader shift in regulatory focus towards Insolvency regulates management and market integrity.
The firm’s leadership, including🏫 Chairman Tuhin Kanta Pandey, has expressed interest in actively engaging with SEBI. He mentioned taking immediate steps to reinforce the regulator’s role. While the firm has denied the allegations, Pandey hinted that his actions could either amplify the issue or uphold SEBI’s((
inserted comments)
