Resurrected Hoax: False Claims of Egypt Legalizing Necrophilia Debunked
A viral social media post has reignited a decade-old hoax, falsely alleging that Egypt’s parliament is contemplating legislation to permit husbands to engage in sexual acts with their deceased wives for up to six hours after death. This claim, which originally surfaced in 2012, has been debunked by fact-checking organizations and Egyptian authorities. No such law exists, nor has there ever been any official proposal or discussion of such legislation within the Egyptian parliament.
The origin of this falsehood can be traced back to an opinion piece published in the Egyptian government-owned newspaper Al-Ahram in April 2012. The piece, penned by Amr Abdel Sami, lacked any supporting evidence. Subsequently, the claim was misreported by several international news outlets, including Alarabiya News, Huffington Post, and the Daily Mail. While some of these outlets later corrected their reporting, the misinformation persisted online, periodically resurfacing.
Independent fact-checking organizations in Egypt, including Akhbar Meter and Fatabyyano, have confirmed the non-existence of any such law. Ahmed Gamal, head of the fact-checking department at Akhbar Meter, emphasized that no proposal of this nature was ever debated in parliament or even drafted into a bill. He further noted that the parliament in 2012 was dominated by Islamist groups, making them frequent targets of criticism and fueling unfounded fears about the introduction of extreme laws.
The authoritative bodies on Islamic jurisprudence in Egypt, Al-Azhar and Dar Al-Ifta, have also explicitly condemned the concept of intercourse with a deceased spouse. In 2017, Dar Al-Ifta issued a public statement declaring such an act as strictly forbidden in Islam, classifying it as a major sin deserving of punishment. This religious condemnation further underscores the falsity of the circulating claim.
The initial misreporting of the story also involved a misrepresentation of the National Council for Women’s (NCW) stance. Alarabiya News falsely reported that the NCW had urged parliament not to pass the alleged necrophilia law. However, Mervat Tallawy, the head of the NCW at the time, refuted these claims, clarifying that the council never sent any communication regarding such a law because it was never proposed or discussed.
Furthermore, Alarabiya News later issued a correction, acknowledging the falsehood of the "farewell intercourse" law rumor. Egyptian parliament members denied the existence of such a law, labeling it as "completely unacceptable" and "false." The Secretary-General of the People’s Assembly also denied any knowledge of the alleged law.
While there is no specific law in Egypt criminalizing necrophilia, existing laws against rape and indecent assault carry severe penalties, including life imprisonment and the death penalty. These laws would be applicable in cases of sexual acts with corpses. The false claims regarding the legalization of necrophilia in Egypt are a clear example of misinformation spreading rapidly and persistently online, highlighting the importance of fact-checking and verifying information from credible sources.
The continued circulation of this hoax demonstrates the enduring power of misinformation, particularly in the digital age. Despite repeated debunkings, the false claim resurfaces periodically, fueled by sensational headlines and social media shares. This incident emphasizes the crucial role of fact-checking organizations and responsible media outlets in combating the spread of misinformation and ensuring accurate reporting.
The false narrative also highlights the susceptibility of marginalized groups, such as women in conservative societies, to becoming targets of fabricated stories. The association of the alleged law with an Islamist-dominated parliament played into pre-existing anxieties and biases, contributing to the rapid dissemination of the hoax.
The lack of a specific law criminalizing necrophilia in Egypt has sometimes been misinterpreted as tacit approval or a legal loophole. However, the existing legal framework covering rape and indecent assault provides adequate grounds for prosecution in such cases. This distinction is important to understand, as it clarifies that the absence of a specific law does not imply legality or acceptance of the act.
The responsibility for combating the spread of misinformation lies not only with fact-checkers and journalists but also with social media users. Critical thinking, verifying information from reliable sources, and refraining from sharing unverified content are essential steps in mitigating the impact of online hoaxes.
The recurring nature of this hoax underscores the importance of media literacy and the need for individuals to be discerning consumers of information. By understanding how misinformation spreads and developing critical thinking skills, individuals can protect themselves from falling prey to false narratives and contribute to a more informed and accurate online environment. This case serves as a reminder of the power of misinformation and the importance of vigilance in the face of sensational claims.
