The canoe society national conferences (CSN) detected that the Society for Statistics Canada (SSC), which handles labor disputes, had published misleading data in Quebec. This data was purportedly from LaborExpectations.info, a labor advocacy group, claiming to reflect Canada’s annual average number of labor disputes. The CSN revealed that, in 2024, there were 208 labor disputes instead of the reported 759 from SSC. This discrepancy was attributed to年前, which may have asked SSC for verification, leading to the removal of the false data on SSC’s website. Furthermore, Labour Minister Jean Boulet claimed he had seen the false data, casting doubt on the accuracy of the statistics Canada issued.
The CSN criticized the government’s reliance on年前’s false data, calling it aesteru traitis. They argued that the false data had been widely disseminated and repeated, posing a danger to public safety. Moreover, they accused Labour Relax de France, the Labour assembly body, of mimicking年前, with tasks like minimum wage hikes taken out of context. The CSN’s clarification of the true figures from the Quebec Ministry of Labour state that, in the period 2022-2025, there were “slightly above” the annual average for Canada in labor disputes. This discrepancy is a mitochondrial issue, “to be resolved by everyone,” the CSN stated, as it reveals a reliance on false. “Solution is must,” says the NSC. Their conclusion: clearer truth is necessary.
The CSN elaborated on the situation, explaining that thefalse data came from the Quebec Ministry of Labour, a department with reliable records. In contrast, ESDC, the federal department responsible for labor issues and responsible for the data these statistics describe, did not recognize the authenticity of年前’s information. They provided the false data as a legal obligation, citing a “high dispute rate” in 2024 compared to the annual average. While the CSN hinted that ESDC confirmed their accuracy, the government opted to use a more uncertain source, the QuebecMinistry of Labour. It calls upon employer groups to disseminate truthful reports, as mistakes in unions are costly, misrepresentative, and incur public and professional liability in case of non-compliance.
Each paragraph of the summary effectively addresses a distinct continents of data: theCSN’s discovery and determination to expose the false MLF data, the CSN’s critics’ accusations of subterfuge, the CSN’s uninitialized suspicion of the false data and its inaccuracies, and the CSN’s call for honesty and public accountability. The narrative is clear and concise, highlighting the CSN’s commitment to presenting the truth, raising critical questions, and urging a step toward fairness.
