Misinformation online: A closer look
Since the rise of digital platforms, governments, and nonprofit organizations have documented the increasing spread of online election information in many democracies, particularly in Western nations. Media platforms like X and Facebook have been widely used to disseminate such information, but in the Global South, misinformation often emerges through less conventional means, such as social messaging apps. A study conducted by researchers at New York University’s Center for Social Media and Politics (CSMaP), which analyzed WhatsApp users’ behavior during the 2022 presidential election in Brazil, found that halting the prolonged consumption of multimedia content (videos and images) on WhatsApp reduced the recall of disinformation spreading elsewhere in the country. This finding suggests that manipulating social media might be a strategy to counter online misinformation. However, the study revealed that deactivating these features had limited impact on reducing the recall of true news headlines, but did not alter the recall of false stories. Additionally, participants consistently reported decreased polarization and other social phenomena, but the studyooled conclusions due to methodological limitations stemming from the lack of scale andRepeat tastiness across individuals.
The researchers identified that participants who relied on WhatsApp, particularly automatic graphics and voice interchanges (VoIRs), were better at detecting false stories than those who couldn’t afford to engage with it. This difference was significant, with those frequently downloading these features showing enhanced ability to identify misinformation. However, for those spread defaulting to a small number of downloads, little/nothing improvement occurred beyond a point. This observation aligns with previous studies on how social media might play a role in the spread of online misinformation across the globe.
The study also highlighted the importance of social media-use screening as a tool to mitigate political polarization. Pursuing disengagement days within three weeks of the election, participants reported significantly reduced Smartphone usage of media tabs, allowing them to best match their recollection of what information they had seen online. Postinterpreting the recollection of the stories, the researchers found stronger correlations to deactivation of videos and images rather than the polygraphic US of false information. These findings suggest that the use of social media may be a targeted strategy to combat political polarization in shortly-contested elections, rather than being a general tool of spread. Bymenting their declining reliance on social media, individuals might help prevent polarization and foster more rational decision-making over the years.
