Greens Candidate’s Controversial Stance on Hamas and Zionism Sparks Debate Amidst Heightened Tensions in Middle East
The Australian political landscape is embroiled in a fresh controversy surrounding the Greens party’s stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, following comments made by a newly announced candidate, Omar Sakr. Sakr, a poet running for the Greens in the western Sydney seat of Blaxland, has publicly refused to condemn Hamas, the militant group that launched a deadly attack on Israel in October 2023, killing over a thousand people. His statements, which also include the assertion that "Zionists are deeply antisemitic," have drawn criticism from various quarters, including Jewish community leaders and even some within the Greens party. The controversy comes at a time of heightened tensions in the Middle East, with the aftermath of the Hamas attack and Israel’s subsequent military response in Gaza fueling passionate debate both internationally and within Australia.
Sakr’s comments align with a pattern of recent statements by Greens MPs and candidates that have echoed the rhetoric of a radical fringe of the Palestinian protest movement. This includes previous instances where Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi declined to comment on the future of Hamas in a potential Palestinian state, and Greens NSW MP Jenny Leong apologized for invoking an antisemitic trope about Jewish influence. These incidents have raised concerns about the Greens’ position on the conflict and its potential to exacerbate tensions within Australia’s diverse communities. While the Greens leadership has attempted to distance itself from some of these statements, the recurring nature of the controversy suggests a deeper ideological divide within the party.
The debate surrounding Sakr’s candidacy is further complicated by the broader context of rising antisemitism in the wake of the Hamas attacks. The arson attack on a Melbourne synagogue, which occurred shortly after the attacks, has fueled anxieties within the Jewish community. While the perpetrators have not been definitively identified, the incident has been seized upon by some to promote conspiracy theories and antisemitic narratives. Sarah Schwartz, executive officer of the left-wing, largely anti-Zionist Jewish Council of Australia, condemned these conspiracy theories and cautioned against politicizing the attack. Her stance underscores the complexity of the issue, with even those critical of Israel’s actions denouncing the spread of antisemitism.
The Greens’ response to the controversy has been marked by a degree of ambiguity. While party leader Adam Bandt has stated that he would not use the same language as Sakr, he has also reaffirmed the Greens’ commitment to a Palestinian state and criticism of the Israeli government. This balancing act reflects the party’s attempt to maintain its support for Palestinian self-determination while distancing itself from more extreme rhetoric. However, critics argue that this approach fails to adequately address the issue of antisemitism within the party and risks emboldening those who espouse such views. Sakr himself has not explicitly retracted his previous comments, but has stated his support for the Greens’ official position.
The controversy surrounding the Greens comes as the Labor government has also faced criticism for its stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Labor has taken a tougher stance against Israel in recent months, including supporting UN resolutions critical of Israeli settlements and imposing sanctions against extremist settlers. This shift has drawn the ire of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has accused Labor of antisemitism. The government rejects this accusation, arguing that criticism of Israeli policies is not inherently antisemitic. The escalating tensions between the two countries add another layer of complexity to the domestic debate within Australia.
The Greens’ handling of this controversy has significant implications for the party’s electoral prospects and its broader political standing. The party risks alienating Jewish voters and those concerned about rising antisemitism, while also facing pressure from within its own ranks to take a more decisive stance against extremism. The escalating tensions in the Middle East, coupled with the polarized nature of the debate within Australia, make this a delicate issue for all political parties to navigate. The upcoming election campaign will likely see the issue of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict feature prominently, and the Greens will face increasing scrutiny over their position and the rhetoric of their candidates.
