The Battle Against Climate Misinformation on Social Media
The global fight against climate change extends beyond conference halls and into the digital realm, where a relentless struggle against misinformation and disinformation is unfolding. While international delegates gathered at COP29 in Azerbaijan to discuss emissions reductions, a parallel online campaign sought to undermine the summit’s efforts, promoting fossil fuels and denying the human role in climate change. This digital battleground, characterized by the spread of false and misleading information, poses a significant threat to effective climate action.
Social media platforms, including X (formerly Twitter), Facebook, TikTok, and even LinkedIn, have become potent vectors for climate misinformation. These platforms’ speed and reach enable the rapid dissemination of inaccurate rhetoric, often outpacing the spread of factual information. This phenomenon is exacerbated by the influence of online personalities and political figures who exploit these platforms to amplify climate denial, further eroding public trust in science and journalism.
A recent report by Global Witness highlighted the prevalence of climate denial and misinformation on TikTok during COP29. Numerous comments on videos posted by major news outlets disputed the existence of climate change, labeling it a “lie” or “hoax.” Though TikTok has policies prohibiting such content and has invested in educational initiatives, the platform’s struggle to effectively moderate user-generated content underscores the challenge of curbing the spread of misinformation.
The influence of key figures in spreading climate denial on social media is undeniable. Research has identified former President Donald Trump as a major driver of climate denialism on X, with his posts and retweets by affiliated groups significantly shaping public discourse. This activity often creates "echo chambers," where climate skeptics and believers exist in isolated online communities, reinforcing their respective viewpoints and hindering productive dialogue.
The spread of climate misinformation is often amplified following extreme weather events. In the aftermath of Hurricanes Helene and Milton, conspiracy theories about the storms’ origins flourished online, with some accusing the government of using nonexistent weather machines or claiming solar geoengineering as the culprit. Similarly, the Maui wildfires triggered a wave of false narratives, ranging from government-deployed laser beams to accusations against Oprah Winfrey. These incidents demonstrate how easily misinformation can exploit moments of crisis and vulnerability.
These online misinformation campaigns are not always spontaneous. Research suggests that foreign state actors, including Russia and China, have amplified misleading narratives about climate change. This strategic deployment of disinformation serves to sow discord, undermine trust in official responses, and hinder effective crisis management. Furthermore, vested interests, including fossil fuel companies and related organizations, have been linked to disinformation campaigns, often employing sophisticated tactics to manipulate public perception and protect their industries from climate action. A recent example involves the funding of anti-offshore wind campaigns disguised as whale conservation efforts, diverting attention from the real threats to marine life posed by climate change.
While social media presents a formidable challenge, it also offers tools for positive change. Environmental activists and organizations leverage these platforms to connect with global audiences, organize movements, and counter misinformation. Greta Thunberg’s Fridays for Future movement has effectively utilized social media to mobilize young people and advocate for climate action. These efforts demonstrate the potential for social media to be a force for good in the fight against climate change. However, the ongoing struggle against misinformation underscores the urgent need for social media companies to implement robust content moderation policies and for individuals to critically evaluate information encountered online. The fight against climate change is a multi-faceted battle, and winning it requires addressing the pervasive threat of online misinformation.
