Meta Under Fire for Profiting from Pro-Russian Disinformation Campaign
A bombshell report has revealed that social media behemoth Meta profited handsomely from a sophisticated pro-Russian disinformation network operating on its platform. Researchers from Check First, Reset Tech, and AI Forensics allege that Meta earned US$338,000 between August 2023 and November 2024 by hosting at least 8,000 pieces of sponsored content linked to the "Doppelganger" operation. This revelation has ignited a firestorm of criticism, raising serious questions about Meta’s commitment to combating disinformation and its compliance with international sanctions.
The Doppelganger network, first identified in 2022, employs a multi-pronged approach to disseminate pro-Kremlin narratives. Its tactics include mimicking established Western media outlets, utilizing AI-generated profiles, and leveraging bot accounts to amplify its reach. Content ranges from cartoons mocking European politicians to messages criticizing Western aid to Ukraine, all carefully designed to sow discord and undermine Western unity. The network’s activities targeted tens of thousands of Facebook users across France, Germany, Poland, and Italy, exploiting the platform’s vast user base to spread its propaganda.
Despite international sanctions imposed on two Russian companies, namely the Social Design Agency (SDA), widely believed to be behind the Doppelganger operation, the disinformation campaign continued unabated on Facebook. The researchers argue that Meta’s continued acceptance of advertising revenue from these sanctioned entities represents a blatant disregard for international law and raises serious legal concerns. Guillaume Kuster, chief of Check First, pointedly criticized Meta for reviewing, approving, and distributing advertisements linked to the SDA despite these sanctions.
Meta’s response to the allegations has been somewhat evasive. While acknowledging the existence of Doppelganger in previous reports, the company maintains that it has been proactive in combating the network’s activities. Meta claims to have been the first tech company to uncover the campaign and asserts that it has blocked tens of thousands of related posts. However, critics argue that these actions are insufficient and that Meta’s focus on reactive measures, such as blocking posts, fails to address the root of the problem: its monetization of disinformation.
The Doppelganger operation has demonstrated remarkable adaptability, evolving from traditional posts to paid advertisements on Facebook and expanding its presence across various social media platforms, including Bluesky. Experts note the network’s sophisticated tactics, highlighting its ability to latch onto current events and manipulate real-world concerns to amplify pro-Russian narratives. The use of AI-generated profiles and coordinated bot activity further underscores the campaign’s calculated and organized nature.
Ironically, the exposure of Doppelganger’s activities through media coverage and research reports inadvertently contributes to the network’s success. The increased attention, while intended to denounce the disinformation campaign, paradoxically amplifies its message and raises awareness of the pro-Russian narratives it promotes. This unintended consequence underscores the complex challenge of combating disinformation in the digital age, where even exposure can inadvertently serve the propagandists’ aims. The ongoing saga of Doppelganger and Meta’s entanglement highlights the urgent need for stricter regulations and greater transparency within the social media landscape to effectively address the growing threat of disinformation.
