Republicans Prepare to Prioritize Voting Bills in New Congress, Sparking Democratic Concerns and Legal Challenges
As Republicans gear up to assume control of both chambers of Congress and the White House next month, a key GOP lawmaker has signaled their intent to prioritize a pair of controversial voting-related bills. Congressman Bryan Steil (R-Wis.), chair of the Committee on House Administration, outlined plans to advance the American Confidence in Elections (ACE) Act and the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act. These legislative efforts, framed by Republicans as bolstering election integrity, are anticipated to encounter stiff opposition from Democrats and voting rights advocates, setting the stage for a contentious battle over voting access and election administration in the upcoming legislative session. The narrow Republican majorities in both the House and Senate will likely necessitate compromises and revisions to the proposed legislation, potentially opening avenues for bipartisan collaboration.
The ACE Act, a comprehensive package encompassing nearly 50 individual bills, represents a significant push by House Republicans to reshape election laws. Championed by Steil, the act is touted as the most conservative election integrity bill considered by the House in over two decades. Its provisions, which include measures related to voter identification, ballot access, and election administration procedures, have drawn sharp criticism from civil rights organizations and Democratic lawmakers, who argue that the bill would disenfranchise voters and undermine democratic principles. Concerns have been raised that the ACE Act would nationalize restrictive voting practices, potentially rolling back existing pro-voter laws in jurisdictions like Washington, D.C. Opponents have urged Congress to prioritize legislation that strengthens voting rights protections and expands ballot access, rather than pursuing measures perceived as restrictive.
The SAVE Act, sponsored by Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), mandates proof of U.S. citizenship for voting in federal elections. The bill, which passed the House in July with unanimous Republican support and near-unanimous Democratic opposition, stalled in the Democratically-controlled Senate. Republicans attempted to attach the SAVE Act to government funding legislation, but these efforts ultimately proved unsuccessful. While some Democrats have expressed openness to bipartisan discussions on certain voting policies, such as increased funding for election administration and restrictions on foreign money in U.S. elections, the SAVE Act and its citizenship verification requirements remain a major point of contention.
The renewed push for these voting bills follows a period of heightened partisan tension surrounding election integrity and voter access. Republicans have repeatedly raised concerns about voter fraud and election security, while Democrats have accused their counterparts of using these claims as a pretext to suppress voter turnout, particularly among minority groups and Democratic-leaning constituencies. The debate intensified in the aftermath of the 2020 presidential election, with former President Trump and his allies making unsubstantiated allegations of widespread voter fraud. These unsubstantiated claims have been repeatedly refuted by election officials and courts across the country.
While acknowledging the potential for bipartisan cooperation on certain aspects of election reform, Democratic lawmakers have expressed deep reservations about the Republican-led voting bills. Rep. Joe Morelle (D-N.Y.), the ranking Democrat on the House Administration Committee, has criticized the ACE Act and the SAVE Act as efforts to restrict voting rights, contrasting this approach with Democrats’ focus on expanding ballot access and protecting voting rights. Morelle pointedly noted the absence of Republican concerns about non-citizen voting following the November elections, suggesting that these concerns were primarily motivated by partisan considerations rather than genuine evidence of widespread fraud.
The anticipated clash over voting legislation in the new Congress is likely to extend beyond the halls of Congress and into the courts. Voting rights advocates have vowed to challenge any new restrictive voting laws, setting the stage for potential legal battles that could ultimately determine the future of voting access in the United States. Marc Elias, a prominent voting rights lawyer, has publicly pledged legal action against any new voter suppression laws enacted by Republicans, underscoring the high stakes of this upcoming legislative fight. The partisan divide on voting rights issues reflects a deeper ideological and political battle over the fundamental principles of democratic governance and the future of American democracy.
