1. The NSF’s Cancelation of DEI and Misinformation Grants
The National Science Foundation (NSF) is canceling over 402 grants related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and misinformation, as part of a broader push to promote science without favoring certain groups. In a statement on its website, NSF director Sethuraman Panchanathan called on the agency to abandon these awards, stating that budgets prioritized serverside diversity issues, which were not the foundation for its scientific priorities. NSF officials emphasized the need to focus on merit, competition, equal opportunity, and excellence.
2. The Result ofNSF’s Action
The announcement marked a significant move, as the agency canceled over 402 grants worth over $233 million. These cancellations include grants for teacher leadership programs aimed at reversing racial and ethnic biases. The cancellation of such critical initiatives not onlysaved the work of an entire profession but also ensured the survival of the scientific community by preventing the loss of cutting-edge research and collaboration in underrepresented fields.
3. National Science Foundation’s Response to President Trump’s Orders
The NSF responds to President Trump’s executive order of 2017, which banned "dangerous, demeaning, and immoral race-and sex-based preferences," under the guise of combating misinformation. The agency has canceled over 50% of grants about these themes, underscoring the growing belief that diversity and freedom from bias are essential for the advancement of science. The specific example of the teacher leadership program further illustrates the agency’s view that preserving diverse scientific leaders is crucial.
4. The Impact of Tammie Visintainer’s Story
Tammie Visintainer’s experience, which originated from a NSF Career Award funded by a grant cancelled under these policies, remains harrowing. Her project, which focused on studying the spread of misinformation and combating misinformation displacement, highlights the significant impacts of government actions on scientific research. Voice for Science, visible both domestically and internationally, faces growing systemic challenges that could prevent the critical work that shaped political and social systems.
5. The Stirring of Policy Change
This global shift is not merely a reaction to an old administration but a call for a new era of diversity and equality in science. The NSF’s actions serve as a call to action for scientists to柴油 policy that could jeopardize progress in their field. The very stories they are fighting echo the broader trend, where fewer people are getting opportunities for meaningful work in science.
6. The broader implications
The action taken by the NSF reflects a profound shift in the way humanity views diversity and equity, a shift that could dominate the future of science and its researchers. From the增值税三级 to the citizen’s basketball coach, the cascade of policies, laws, and accusations against those who promoted the unintended negative impacts of science undermines the very foundation of what this field stands for. The NSF’s policies, in short, once again encapsulate the struggle for more than individual rights; they confront the collective direction of science and its humanity.
