Hogue Inquiry Clears Canadian Parliamentarians of Treason, Highlights Disinformation as Primary Threat to Democracy
A comprehensive federal inquiry led by Justice Marie-Josée Hogue has concluded that no Canadian parliamentarians acted as "traitors" in relation to foreign interference schemes. While a previous report by the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians (NSICOP) suggested some parliamentarians were “witting” or “semi-witting” participants, the Hogue inquiry found no evidence to support such claims. The inquiry acknowledged concerns regarding certain parliamentarians’ potentially problematic relationships with foreign officials, poor judgment, naiveté, and questionable ethics. However, the investigation did not uncover any evidence of conspiracy with foreign states against Canada. Hogue’s final report, spanning 860 pages, emphasized the genuine threat of foreign interference while also underscoring the resilience of Canada’s democratic processes.
Despite clearing parliamentarians of treasonous acts, the Hogue report identified disinformation and misinformation campaigns, both foreign and domestic, as the most significant threat to Canadian democracy. While traditional methods of foreign interference remain a concern, the report highlighted the increasing use of sophisticated technological means to spread disinformation through traditional media and social media platforms. Hogue stressed the insidious nature of this threat, citing the difficulty in countering it effectively. However, she urged a unified and forceful approach to combat this "existential threat."
The inquiry’s findings, while acknowledging the presence of foreign interference attempts, particularly from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and India, concluded that these efforts had limited impact on the 2019 and 2021 federal elections. Hogue reassured Canadians that the country’s electoral system and democratic institutions remain robust, echoing her preliminary report’s findings that foreign interference did not alter the outcomes of either election. While acknowledging a few isolated instances where foreign interference may have influenced nomination contests or riding-level election results, the report emphasized the lack of evidence suggesting any significant institutional impact or successful parliamentary elections resulting from foreign interference.
The inquiry addressed specific allegations of Chinese interference in the 2019 Liberal nomination in Don Valley North, involving then-candidate Han Dong. Previous media reports, citing unnamed national security sources, alleged that Chinese students were bussed in to support Dong’s candidacy under pressure. Dong vehemently denied these allegations and is currently suing the media outlet involved. The Hogue report acknowledged the existence of unsubstantiated intelligence indicating such activities, including alleged threats by the PRC consulate in Toronto against students who didn’t support Dong.
The report also analyzed a controversial phone conversation between Dong and a PRC consular official concerning the detention of Michael Kovrig and Michael Spavor, two Canadians held by China on national security grounds. Media reports, based on leaked documents, suggested Dong advocated delaying the Two Michaels’ release, a claim he consistently denied. Hogue’s report examined a CSIS summary of the conversation, noting its incompleteness and the lack of substantiation for its allegations. The report acknowledged the potential loss of nuance in translation, as the conversation took place in Mandarin. While unable to assess the accuracy of the CSIS summary due to the classified nature of the information, Hogue stated that classified information supported Dong’s denial of advocating for the delayed release of the Two Michaels.
To bolster Canada’s defense against foreign interference, the Hogue commission put forth 51 recommendations. These include developing a comprehensive government-wide plan to address foreign interference, incorporating it into a renewed national security strategy, establishing mechanisms for declassifying and publicly communicating relevant intelligence, and devising methods to monitor open-source information while safeguarding Canadians’ privacy.
The implementation of these recommendations now poses a challenge, given the impending departure of Prime Minister Trudeau, the ongoing Liberal leadership race, and the likelihood of a spring election. The responsibility for enacting these recommendations may fall upon the next government, which will face the continuing scrutiny of foreign states in the upcoming election. The report underscores the ongoing nature of the threat and the need for continued vigilance and proactive measures to protect Canadian democracy. The report serves as a critical resource for policymakers and the public, providing valuable insights into the complex landscape of foreign interference and offering concrete steps to strengthen Canada’s democratic resilience.
