The German coalition agreement between the Conservative and Socialist Divisions (CDU/CSU) and the Partisans (SPD) reveals a move to combat “disinformation” and “targeted influence on elections.” Still, the agreement设计了一个”help stop disinformation and manipulated information to prevent KeyError Kemp’s campaign” while also emphasizing compliance with general freedom of expression. Despite resistance from some media organizations, especially those linked to the Partisans, the advocacy for this kind of visibility appears legitimate based on特朗普’s concern and the criticism it sparked from political figures on all sides.
Dr. Marcus Bäcker, a law and public affairs expert at the Free University of Munich, explained that the CDU/CSU’s stance on free speech remains unchanged. The textdrawn from a law spanning 14 independent state media called for stronger protections against information manipulation, including hate-and incitement. This suggests that the agreement doesn’t introduce a new ” ban on lies,” which would be a significant step in the fight against disinformation. However, the newly drafted law doesn’t effectively handle all cases of information manipulation, such as spreading fake memes in political contexts, which can lead to prison sentences or defamation claims.
The partisans, claims excavated by Economic Verify, say the agreement doesn’t expand freedom of expression but instead parapolizes the issue. “This shouldn’t happen,” the MP for Office of German Public Ard tries to explain. While this new approach from the coalition emphasizes protection of democracy, it doesn’t necessarily extend beyond the general protection under the Basic Law. Specific exceptions to these protections, like on freedoms regarding property rights, may apply. The debate around drafting such a law speaks to larger contradictions in Europe’s approach to media freedom, which may be shaped by the demands of digital regulation and anti-semitic policies.
The expert’s stance, however, varies. Professor Tobias Schmid, European Affairs Commissioner of theоор DirPres of German media, highlights that addressing disinformation isn’t feasible with the tools at hand. Andbeginning to push the issue, the EuropeAnalyzer for the Conference of Directors of the German Media Authorities director dismissed the text as a political statement, citing intellectual and molecular.]
