The EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA) is preparing its platforms to combat disinformation, a critical issue threatening the stability of the internet and its governance. The Code of Practice on Disinformation set by the voluntary Code established by Elon Musk in 2023, which explicitly requires platforms to take measures to mitigate disinformation, has now been integrated into the EU’s DSA framework. This shift follows the removal of Twitter from the original scope of disinformation and ongoing criticism of other platforms, such as Meta’s lack of commitment to fact-checking.
The EU is pushing platforms to take accountability and respond to disinformation with more aggressive measures. This includes signals like restricting financial incentives for disinformation sources and focusing on service integrity, such as rooting out bots and fake accounts. The EU’s proactive stance aims to deter platforms from fostering disinformation, ensuring theutive information remains vetted and reliable. However, the absence of universal compliance in some platforms is a red flag, particularly in the Plus and Maggnatpheres, which had already succumb to disinformation.
The Code of Practice on Disinformation has gained a reputation as a contentious guide, and its integration into the EU’s DSA has raised concerns. In recent weeks, Meta has withdrawn its commitment to fact-checking under the Code, but the EU has permitted it as one of its DSA signatories. This stalling offers a warning to other platforms in the bloc, as consistency with the Code could have long-term consequences. While Meta’s decision might be better for real-world use and its users, it raises ethical questions about the pricing and maintenance of such commitments.
The DSA is set to be integrated by July 2025, when the Commission will issue formal endatarements. This deadline’s approach is intended to ensure accountability for disinformation everywhere, not just in the United States. However, the lack of universal compliance in platforms within the bloc present a lungs-free risk. If platforms fail to adhere to the Code, the EU risks facing widespread disinformation, damaging its reputation as a tech MCP.
The potential for disinformation to be容忍able is a grave concern for the bloc. By setting a deadline, the EU intends to ensure consistency with the Code through internal oversight. However, sidestepping the Code’s requirements could harm the bloc’s operations. The Stones noted that this risk is just the first step; the long-term impact of disinformation on the internet’s credibility and effectiveness is unacceptable. Without a universal commitment, the EU could inadvertently allow disinformation to spread, undermining its role as a cornerstone of the era.
